2011Jilin yixueRequires access

Analysis of the treatment effect of different types of operating ostium maxillary in endoscopic sinus surgery

Cheng Dao-jun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the different cure rates of two operation ways curing maxillary sinusitis.Methods A total of 116 cases(155 sides)suffering from chronic maxillary sinusitis and receiving endoscopic sinus surgery were divided into two groups at random.In group A,both and uncinate process were excised,and the maxillary sinus mucosa mouths were not expanded.In group B,both the obstructive factors of middle nasal meatus and uncinate process were resected,and the maxillary sinus mucosa mouths were excised.Results On the standard of 1997(Haikou),68 sides of 75 sides were cured in group A and 74 sides of 80 sides were cured in group B.the cure rate was 90.7% in group A and 92.5% in group B,and the mend rate was 9.3% in group A and 7.5% in group B in a follow-up of more than one year.Conclusion Two operation ways have the same treatment effect under nasal endoscopy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the different cure rates of two operation ways curing maxillary sinusitis.Methods A total of 116 cases(155 sides)suffering from chronic maxillary sinusitis and receiving endoscopic sinus surgery were divided into two groups at random.In group A,both and uncinate process were excised,and the maxillary sinus mucosa mouths were not expanded.In group B,both the obstructive factors of middle nasal meatus and uncinate process were resected,and the maxillary sinus mucosa mouths were excised.Results On the standard of 1997(Haikou),68 sides of 75 sides were cured in group A and 74 sides of 80 sides were cured in group B.the cure rate was 90.7% in group A and 92.5% in group B,and the mend rate was 9.3% in group A and 7.5% in group B in a follow-up of more than one year.Conclusion Two operation ways have the same treatment effect under nasal endoscopy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the different cure rates of two operation ways curing maxillary sinusitis.Methods A total of 116 cases(155 sides)suffering from chronic maxillary sinusitis and receiving endoscopic sinus surgery were divided into two groups at random.In group A,both and uncinate process were excised,and the maxillary sinus mucosa mouths were not expanded.In group B,both the obstructive factors of middle nasal meatus and uncinate process were resected,and the maxillary sinus mucosa mouths were excised.Results On the standard of 1997(Haikou),68 sides of 75 sides were cured in group A and 74 sides of 80 sides were cured in group B.the cure rate was 90.7% in group A and 92.5% in group B,and the mend rate was 9.3% in group A and 7.5% in group B in a follow-up of more than one year.Conclusion Two operation ways have the same treatment effect under nasal endoscopy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Maxillary sinus, Ostium, Meatus, Sinusitis, Surgery, Cure rate, Chronic sinusitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of the treatment effect of different types of operating ostium maxillary in endoscopic sinus surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens