Expressions of p16~(INK4a),p53 and Ki-67 in cervical intraepithelial lesion by immunohistochemistry and their diagnostic and clinic significance
Yi Shen
Abstract
Yi Shen
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:To explore immunohistochemistry staining for p16INK4a,p53 and Ki-67 as adjunct indicators for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) diagnosis,improving the routine interpretation of cervical histopathology.METHODS:Totally 133 cases of CIN were involoved in this study,which consisted of 31 CIN 1,37 CIN 2,65 CIN 3 from archival data in our hospital.The average age was 44 years(range 20-86 years).All hematoxylin-eosin slides were reexamined independently by three senior pathologists.Nineteen cases of chronic cervicitis and 20 cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma were involved as controls.Immunostains for p16INK4a,p53 and Ki-67 were performed.The expressions of immunostain were scored independent of the corresponding SP stained sections and clinical data except age.Statistical analysis was performed by Univariate χ2 tests and Spearman analysis.RESULTS: The expression of p16 was located in nucleus and cytoplasm.For p53 and Ki-67,were located in nucleus.All three biomarkers correlated positively with the grading of CIN(r were 0.789,0.554 and 0.749,P0.001).In 153 cases of CIN1+,raw agreement between the expression of p16,p53 and Ki-67,and histological diagnosis was 96.7%(148/153),71.9%(110/153) and 88.2%(135/153),respectively.In 102 cases with CIN 2+,sensitivity for p16,p53 and Ki-67 immunostain was 97.1%(99/102),74.5%(76/102) and 97.1%(99/102),respectively.And specificity for these biomarkers was 94.7%(18/19),84.2%(16/19) and 73.7%(14/19),respectively.Combined the three biomarkers,the sensitivity and specificity of CIN 2+ was 98.0%(100/102) and 68.4%(13/19),respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical staining for p16 is a high degree of sensitivity,and specificity appears to be a useful and reliable diagnostic adjunct for distinguishing high-grade CIN.It appears that conjunctive interpretation of p16,p53 and Ki-67 can significantly improve the routine interpretation of cervical histopathology.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE:To explore immunohistochemistry staining for p16INK4a,p53 and Ki-67 as adjunct indicators for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) diagnosis,improving the routine interpretation of cervical histopathology.METHODS:Totally 133 cases of CIN were involoved in this study,which consisted of 31 CIN 1,37 CIN 2,65 CIN 3 from archival data in our hospital.The average age was 44 years(range 20-86 years).All hematoxylin-eosin slides were reexamined independently by three senior pathologists.Nineteen cases of chronic cervicitis and 20 cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma were involved as controls.Immunostains for p16INK4a,p53 and Ki-67 were performed.The expressions of immunostain were scored independent of the corresponding SP stained sections and clinical data except age.Statistical analysis was performed by Univariate χ2 tests and Spearman analysis.RESULTS: The expression of p16 was located in nucleus and cytoplasm.For p53 and Ki-67,were located in nucleus.All three biomarkers correlated positively with the grading of CIN(r were 0.789,0.554 and 0.749,P0.001).In 153 cases of CIN1+,raw agreement between the expression of p16,p53 and Ki-67,and histological diagnosis was 96.7%(148/153),71.9%(110/153) and 88.2%(135/153),respectively.In 102 cases with CIN 2+,sensitivity for p16,p53 and Ki-67 immunostain was 97.1%(99/102),74.5%(76/102) and 97.1%(99/102),respectively.And specificity for these biomarkers was 94.7%(18/19),84.2%(16/19) and 73.7%(14/19),respectively.Combined the three biomarkers,the sensitivity and specificity of CIN 2+ was 98.0%(100/102) and 68.4%(13/19),respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical staining for p16 is a high degree of sensitivity,and specificity appears to be a useful and reliable diagnostic adjunct for distinguishing high-grade CIN.It appears that conjunctive interpretation of p16,p53 and Ki-67 can significantly improve the routine interpretation of cervical histopathology.
Key concepts: Ki-67, Medicine, Immunohistochemistry, Histopathology, Pathology, Univariate analysis, Grading (engineering), Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia