2013Medical RecapitulateRequires access

Comparative Study on Efficacy of Two Kinds of Operations in Treatment of Fungal Maxillary Sinusitis

LI Lan-n

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the curative effect of antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of sinus and inferior meatus middle plus maxillary and single pathway of Efficacy of Group A was 75.0%,of Group B was 97.1%,on fungal maxillary sinusitis.Methods 63 patients from Shaanxi Electron 409 Hospital during Aug.2005 to Jun.2010 with fungal maxillary sinusitis were randomly divided into two groups:Group A(28 cases)treated with antrostomy under the endoscopy by single pathway of maxillary sinus,Group B(35 cases)treated with antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of middle and inferior meatus plus maxillary sinus respectively.All patients were followed up for 6-24 months.Results There were significant difference between the two groups in efficacy(P0.05)maxillary sinus.Conclusion Antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of middle and inferior meatus plus maxillary sinus is better than that by single pathway of maxillary sinus on fungal maxillary sinusitis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the curative effect of antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of sinus and inferior meatus middle plus maxillary and single pathway of Efficacy of Group A was 75.0%,of Group B was 97.1%,on fungal maxillary sinusitis.Methods 63 patients from Shaanxi Electron 409 Hospital during Aug.2005 to Jun.2010 with fungal maxillary sinusitis were randomly divided into two groups:Group A(28 cases)treated with antrostomy under the endoscopy by single pathway of maxillary sinus,Group B(35 cases)treated with antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of middle and inferior meatus plus maxillary sinus respectively.All patients were followed up for 6-24 months.Results There were significant difference between the two groups in efficacy(P0.05)maxillary sinus.Conclusion Antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of middle and inferior meatus plus maxillary sinus is better than that by single pathway of maxillary sinus on fungal maxillary sinusitis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the curative effect of antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of sinus and inferior meatus middle plus maxillary and single pathway of Efficacy of Group A was 75.0%,of Group B was 97.1%,on fungal maxillary sinusitis.Methods 63 patients from Shaanxi Electron 409 Hospital during Aug.2005 to Jun.2010 with fungal maxillary sinusitis were randomly divided into two groups:Group A(28 cases)treated with antrostomy under the endoscopy by single pathway of maxillary sinus,Group B(35 cases)treated with antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of middle and inferior meatus plus maxillary sinus respectively.All patients were followed up for 6-24 months.Results There were significant difference between the two groups in efficacy(P0.05)maxillary sinus.Conclusion Antrostomy under the endoscopy by two pathways of middle and inferior meatus plus maxillary sinus is better than that by single pathway of maxillary sinus on fungal maxillary sinusitis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Maxillary sinus, Sinusitis, Meatus, Endoscopy, Sinus (botany), Dentistry, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study on Efficacy of Two Kinds of Operations in Treatment of Fungal Maxillary Sinusitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens