Effect of Revascularization in the Time Window after Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Thrombolytic Therapy
Qin Xi-xu
Abstract
Qin Xi-xu
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical value of revascularization in the different time after acute myocardial infarction(AMI)treated with thrombolytic therapy.MethodsThe 37 patients were divided into 2 groups according to thrombolytic time after AMI.ResultsThe difference in the reopen rate of blood vessel between earlier therapy(0~6 h)and delayed therapy(6~12 h)were significant(79.17%,61.54%,P0.05),the difference of mortality,repeating angina pectoris,Ⅱdegree atrioventricular block during 5 weeks between these two groups were highly significant(P0.01).ConclusionThrombolytic therapy in 6 hours after AMI has better effect but delayed therapy(6~12 h)still has moderate effect.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the clinical value of revascularization in the different time after acute myocardial infarction(AMI)treated with thrombolytic therapy.MethodsThe 37 patients were divided into 2 groups according to thrombolytic time after AMI.ResultsThe difference in the reopen rate of blood vessel between earlier therapy(0~6 h)and delayed therapy(6~12 h)were significant(79.17%,61.54%,P0.05),the difference of mortality,repeating angina pectoris,Ⅱdegree atrioventricular block during 5 weeks between these two groups were highly significant(P0.01).ConclusionThrombolytic therapy in 6 hours after AMI has better effect but delayed therapy(6~12 h)still has moderate effect.
Key concepts: Medicine, Myocardial infarction, Cardiology, Revascularization, Internal medicine, Angina, Significant difference