2010Sichuan Medical JournalRequires access

The clinical analysis of 25 cases of infection in orthopedic trauma using VSD treatment

Xinyu Zheng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective the effect of clinical Analysis of closed suction drainage and conventional techniques in the treatment of orthopedic trauma of infection.Methods 50 patients were randomly divided into two groups,treatment group and control group,income group were routinely pre-debridement,the treatment group with VSD dressing covering the wound,covering each time 5~7d,attractive skin grafting until the wound granulation fullness OK,according to anti-inflammatory etiology check.The control group,depending on the situation in 1~2d wound dressing change time,place a larger drainage of the wound,while sensitive to antibiotics with anti-inflammatory,and every 5~7d line pathogenic inspected at least once to observe the overall efficacy and healing time differences.Results Treatment group,17 patients cured(68%),7 cases markedly effective(28%),and the total efficiency of 96%.With the control group cured 11 cases(44%) were cured,9 cases(36%),compared with 80% of the total effective rate,the cure rate were significantly different.The treatment group the average wound healing time was significantly shorter,compared with the control group,significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion VSD is a wound infection in orthopedic trauma and should promote the use of a treatment technology that is superior to the traditional dressing and drainage technology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective the effect of clinical Analysis of closed suction drainage and conventional techniques in the treatment of orthopedic trauma of infection.Methods 50 patients were randomly divided into two groups,treatment group and control group,income group were routinely pre-debridement,the treatment group with VSD dressing covering the wound,covering each time 5~7d,attractive skin grafting until the wound granulation fullness OK,according to anti-inflammatory etiology check.The control group,depending on the situation in 1~2d wound dressing change time,place a larger drainage of the wound,while sensitive to antibiotics with anti-inflammatory,and every 5~7d line pathogenic inspected at least once to observe the overall efficacy and healing time differences.Results Treatment group,17 patients cured(68%),7 cases markedly effective(28%),and the total efficiency of 96%.With the control group cured 11 cases(44%) were cured,9 cases(36%),compared with 80% of the total effective rate,the cure rate were significantly different.The treatment group the average wound healing time was significantly shorter,compared with the control group,significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion VSD is a wound infection in orthopedic trauma and should promote the use of a treatment technology that is superior to the traditional dressing and drainage technology.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective the effect of clinical Analysis of closed suction drainage and conventional techniques in the treatment of orthopedic trauma of infection.Methods 50 patients were randomly divided into two groups,treatment group and control group,income group were routinely pre-debridement,the treatment group with VSD dressing covering the wound,covering each time 5~7d,attractive skin grafting until the wound granulation fullness OK,according to anti-inflammatory etiology check.The control group,depending on the situation in 1~2d wound dressing change time,place a larger drainage of the wound,while sensitive to antibiotics with anti-inflammatory,and every 5~7d line pathogenic inspected at least once to observe the overall efficacy and healing time differences.Results Treatment group,17 patients cured(68%),7 cases markedly effective(28%),and the total efficiency of 96%.With the control group cured 11 cases(44%) were cured,9 cases(36%),compared with 80% of the total effective rate,the cure rate were significantly different.The treatment group the average wound healing time was significantly shorter,compared with the control group,significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion VSD is a wound infection in orthopedic trauma and should promote the use of a treatment technology that is superior to the traditional dressing and drainage technology.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Orthopedic surgery, Orthopedic trauma, Debridement (dental), Wound healing, Antibiotics, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical analysis of 25 cases of infection in orthopedic trauma using VSD treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens