On Tang Zhen’s Attitude toward Study
Cheng Bi-ying
Abstract
Cheng Bi-ying
Abstract
Tang Zhen is one of the progressive thinkers in the early Qing Dynasty . It has never been enough for the academic field to research his attitude toward the study. The author in this paper thinks that Tang Zhen’s language and literature was heavily characterized by reality, that is, he criticized the disadvantages of the old study and also actively advocated the new one. Tang Zhen walked on a unique academic way. He discussed the academic, while he did not simply discuss it on it, but expressed his perception and understanding of the real politics. Tang Zhen composed his unique thought system about the study on the basis of the fact and reality after he criticized the impractical and artificial academic since Song and Ming the Dynasties.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Tang Zhen is one of the progressive thinkers in the early Qing Dynasty . It has never been enough for the academic field to research his attitude toward the study. The author in this paper thinks that Tang Zhen’s language and literature was heavily characterized by reality, that is, he criticized the disadvantages of the old study and also actively advocated the new one. Tang Zhen walked on a unique academic way. He discussed the academic, while he did not simply discuss it on it, but expressed his perception and understanding of the real politics. Tang Zhen composed his unique thought system about the study on the basis of the fact and reality after he criticized the impractical and artificial academic since Song and Ming the Dynasties.
Key concepts: Politics, Field (mathematics), Perception, Aesthetics, Psychology, Sociology, Philosophy, Epistemology