2004•Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Carvedilol in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension in 72 patients

Wei Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To observe clinical efficacy and safety of carvedilol in treating essential hypertension and compare with metoprolol. METHODS:One hundred and four-forty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were divided into:carvedilol group (n=72;(61±s 7)a ) received carvedilol 10-20 mg, po, bid and metoprolol group (n=72;(62±8)a ) received metoprolol 25-50 mg, po, bid, for 6 wk. RESULTS: The total effective rates were 81 % for carvedilol group, and 72 % for metoprolol group, respectively. The obvious effctive rates were 44 % for carvedilol group, and 36 % for metoprolol group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05). After 6 wk treatment, the heart rates of all patients were significantly decreased. At the end of wk 6 the T/P of SBP and DBP of ABPM were 61.2 % and 50.3 % in carvedilol group and microalbuminuria was significantly decreased. There was significant difference between the two groups (P0.01). The most adverse reactions were 19 %, 18 %, respectively, but mild and tolerable. CONCLUSION:Carvedilol is effective, safe in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension, and there is a good protective action to nephros.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To observe clinical efficacy and safety of carvedilol in treating essential hypertension and compare with metoprolol. METHODS:One hundred and four-forty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were divided into:carvedilol group (n=72;(61±s 7)a ) received carvedilol 10-20 mg, po, bid and metoprolol group (n=72;(62±8)a ) received metoprolol 25-50 mg, po, bid, for 6 wk. RESULTS: The total effective rates were 81 % for carvedilol group, and 72 % for metoprolol group, respectively. The obvious effctive rates were 44 % for carvedilol group, and 36 % for metoprolol group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05). After 6 wk treatment, the heart rates of all patients were significantly decreased. At the end of wk 6 the T/P of SBP and DBP of ABPM were 61.2 % and 50.3 % in carvedilol group and microalbuminuria was significantly decreased. There was significant difference between the two groups (P0.01). The most adverse reactions were 19 %, 18 %, respectively, but mild and tolerable. CONCLUSION:Carvedilol is effective, safe in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension, and there is a good protective action to nephros.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To observe clinical efficacy and safety of carvedilol in treating essential hypertension and compare with metoprolol. METHODS:One hundred and four-forty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were divided into:carvedilol group (n=72;(61±s 7)a ) received carvedilol 10-20 mg, po, bid and metoprolol group (n=72;(62±8)a ) received metoprolol 25-50 mg, po, bid, for 6 wk. RESULTS: The total effective rates were 81 % for carvedilol group, and 72 % for metoprolol group, respectively. The obvious effctive rates were 44 % for carvedilol group, and 36 % for metoprolol group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P 0.05). After 6 wk treatment, the heart rates of all patients were significantly decreased. At the end of wk 6 the T/P of SBP and DBP of ABPM were 61.2 % and 50.3 % in carvedilol group and microalbuminuria was significantly decreased. There was significant difference between the two groups (P0.01). The most adverse reactions were 19 %, 18 %, respectively, but mild and tolerable. CONCLUSION:Carvedilol is effective, safe in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension, and there is a good protective action to nephros.

Key concepts: Carvedilol, Metoprolol, Medicine, Essential hypertension, Microalbuminuria, Internal medicine, Adverse effect, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Carvedilol in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension in 72 patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens