"Non-being" Going to "Being" along the Trace of Differance——Explaining Lao Tzu's "Non-being" with Derrida's Theory of Differance

Non-being would evolve to its opposite(being) along the trace of difference,and thusNon-being is being.As a signifier,non-being serves as the substitute of absent things in the sensational sensuous,which is present on the scene in the irrational sensuous.Non-being is both shapeless in sensational sensuous and shaped in irrational sensuous.The reason that people can apply non-being as being,inaction as action lies in the fact thatnon-being can be and shaped.Non-being is same as and different from beingat the same time.The non-being of different kinds is just the of different kinds.Non-being and being constitutes a play system of difference.Unable to stand alone,non-being and beingco-exist in this play system of difference.Their relationship reflects the playfulness of language,which feasibly provides an open,free and poetic world.