2008Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica ResearchRequires access

Comparative Study on the Risk Assessment Models in Teaching Effect

Ronghua Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Evaluating teaching effect is one of the important issues in our teaching management practice.This paper analyzes several risk assessment models and recommends that the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is suitable for evaluating teaching effect.It is better to generalize the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model to practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Evaluating teaching effect is one of the important issues in our teaching management practice.This paper analyzes several risk assessment models and recommends that the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is suitable for evaluating teaching effect.It is better to generalize the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model to practice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Evaluating teaching effect is one of the important issues in our teaching management practice.This paper analyzes several risk assessment models and recommends that the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is suitable for evaluating teaching effect.It is better to generalize the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model to practice.

Key concepts: Fuzzy logic, Risk assessment, Computer science, Risk analysis (engineering), Management science, Mathematics education, Psychology, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Study on the Risk Assessment Models in Teaching Effect — Research Paper | ScholarLens