2011Hu'nan Shifan Daxue shehui kexue xuebaoRequires access

The Inequality between Art and Beauty——Comments on Ducasse's The Philosophy of Art and Reed's Theory in The Grass Roots of Art

LI Heng-bai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the 20th century,by the drastic revolution of the western modern art,the aesthetic cognition of the relationship between art and beauty has changed accordingly.The assertion ofArt is not equal to beautyfluctuates the aesthetic concept ofArt is beauty.The reasons why art is not equal to beauty lie in:the complexity of the artist self decides that art is not an activity that creates beauty;the differentiation between the two categories,art and beauty,decides that art and beauty can not be mixed up;that many works of art are ugly in art history decides that art is not equivalent to beauty.Art is not equal to beautypresented explicitly in Ducasse's The Philosophy of Art and Reed's The Grass Roots of Art contributes greatly to the modern aesthetics and artistic theories,but,in which there are still some other flaws like the shallowness and extensiveness of the theory's interpretation,the simplicity of ideological understanding and the vagueness of values.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the 20th century,by the drastic revolution of the western modern art,the aesthetic cognition of the relationship between art and beauty has changed accordingly.The assertion ofArt is not equal to beautyfluctuates the aesthetic concept ofArt is beauty.The reasons why art is not equal to beauty lie in:the complexity of the artist self decides that art is not an activity that creates beauty;the differentiation between the two categories,art and beauty,decides that art and beauty can not be mixed up;that many works of art are ugly in art history decides that art is not equivalent to beauty.Art is not equal to beautypresented explicitly in Ducasse's The Philosophy of Art and Reed's The Grass Roots of Art contributes greatly to the modern aesthetics and artistic theories,but,in which there are still some other flaws like the shallowness and extensiveness of the theory's interpretation,the simplicity of ideological understanding and the vagueness of values.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the 20th century,by the drastic revolution of the western modern art,the aesthetic cognition of the relationship between art and beauty has changed accordingly.The assertion ofArt is not equal to beautyfluctuates the aesthetic concept ofArt is beauty.The reasons why art is not equal to beauty lie in:the complexity of the artist self decides that art is not an activity that creates beauty;the differentiation between the two categories,art and beauty,decides that art and beauty can not be mixed up;that many works of art are ugly in art history decides that art is not equivalent to beauty.Art is not equal to beautypresented explicitly in Ducasse's The Philosophy of Art and Reed's The Grass Roots of Art contributes greatly to the modern aesthetics and artistic theories,but,in which there are still some other flaws like the shallowness and extensiveness of the theory's interpretation,the simplicity of ideological understanding and the vagueness of values.

Key concepts: Beauty, Aesthetics, Art, Art methodology, Interpretation (philosophy), Contemporary art, Assertion, Ideology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Inequality between Art and Beauty——Comments on Ducasse's The Philosophy of Art and Reed's Theory in The Grass Roots of Art — Research Paper | ScholarLens