2008•Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRequires access

Clinical value of AAR and API in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B

Minji Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical value of AAR and API in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B.Methods There were 172 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were underwent liver biopsy with their liver function and blood routine taken simultaneously.Three different endpoints were studied according to liver fibrosis stages,namely without/light fibrosis(S0/S1),significant fibrosis(S2/S3/S4) and cirrhosis(S4).The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC) reflected its diagnostic value.Results There was no significant difference in AAR of fibrosis S0,S1,S2,S3 and S4(P0.05).The correlation coefficient between liver fibrosis stages and AAR was 0.107(P0.05).The AUC of AAR with significant fibrosis /cirrhosis was low to 0.7.The API of fibrosis S4 was higher than those of fibrosis S0,S1,S2 and S3(P0.01).The correlation coefficient between liver fibrosis stages and API was 0.314(P0.01).The AUC of API with cirrhosis attached 0.773(P0.01).However,that of significant fibrosis was low to 0.7(P0.05).Conclusion There is little clinical value with AAR in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B.There is definite correlation between liver fibrosis stages and API.API can be used for diagnosis of fibrosis S4.However,it can not discriminate fibrosis S1,S2 and S3.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical value of AAR and API in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B.Methods There were 172 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were underwent liver biopsy with their liver function and blood routine taken simultaneously.Three different endpoints were studied according to liver fibrosis stages,namely without/light fibrosis(S0/S1),significant fibrosis(S2/S3/S4) and cirrhosis(S4).The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC) reflected its diagnostic value.Results There was no significant difference in AAR of fibrosis S0,S1,S2,S3 and S4(P0.05).The correlation coefficient between liver fibrosis stages and AAR was 0.107(P0.05).The AUC of AAR with significant fibrosis /cirrhosis was low to 0.7.The API of fibrosis S4 was higher than those of fibrosis S0,S1,S2 and S3(P0.01).The correlation coefficient between liver fibrosis stages and API was 0.314(P0.01).The AUC of API with cirrhosis attached 0.773(P0.01).However,that of significant fibrosis was low to 0.7(P0.05).Conclusion There is little clinical value with AAR in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B.There is definite correlation between liver fibrosis stages and API.API can be used for diagnosis of fibrosis S4.However,it can not discriminate fibrosis S1,S2 and S3.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical value of AAR and API in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B.Methods There were 172 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were underwent liver biopsy with their liver function and blood routine taken simultaneously.Three different endpoints were studied according to liver fibrosis stages,namely without/light fibrosis(S0/S1),significant fibrosis(S2/S3/S4) and cirrhosis(S4).The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC) reflected its diagnostic value.Results There was no significant difference in AAR of fibrosis S0,S1,S2,S3 and S4(P0.05).The correlation coefficient between liver fibrosis stages and AAR was 0.107(P0.05).The AUC of AAR with significant fibrosis /cirrhosis was low to 0.7.The API of fibrosis S4 was higher than those of fibrosis S0,S1,S2 and S3(P0.01).The correlation coefficient between liver fibrosis stages and API was 0.314(P0.01).The AUC of API with cirrhosis attached 0.773(P0.01).However,that of significant fibrosis was low to 0.7(P0.05).Conclusion There is little clinical value with AAR in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B.There is definite correlation between liver fibrosis stages and API.API can be used for diagnosis of fibrosis S4.However,it can not discriminate fibrosis S1,S2 and S3.

Key concepts: Cirrhosis, Fibrosis, Medicine, Receiver operating characteristic, Gastroenterology, Chronic hepatitis, Liver fibrosis, Liver biopsy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical value of AAR and API in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B — Research Paper | ScholarLens