2010Keji daobaoRequires access

Statistics and Analysis of Abstract Information Included in Chinese Science Abstracts in 2009

Zhen Tang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Based on the statistics for 46161 abstracts in 413 scientific and technical journals indexed by Chinese Science Abstracts (Chinese Edition) in 24 issues in 2009, the ranking of the source journals, the geographical distribution of the author's working places, the distribution of author′s affiliations and research fields are analyzed, which would reflect the capability in scientific research and the academic level of scientific research institutions to some extent. The results are compared with the those obtained in 2008.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on the statistics for 46161 abstracts in 413 scientific and technical journals indexed by Chinese Science Abstracts (Chinese Edition) in 24 issues in 2009, the ranking of the source journals, the geographical distribution of the author's working places, the distribution of author′s affiliations and research fields are analyzed, which would reflect the capability in scientific research and the academic level of scientific research institutions to some extent. The results are compared with the those obtained in 2008.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on the statistics for 46161 abstracts in 413 scientific and technical journals indexed by Chinese Science Abstracts (Chinese Edition) in 24 issues in 2009, the ranking of the source journals, the geographical distribution of the author's working places, the distribution of author′s affiliations and research fields are analyzed, which would reflect the capability in scientific research and the academic level of scientific research institutions to some extent. The results are compared with the those obtained in 2008.

Key concepts: Ranking (information retrieval), Library science, Distribution (mathematics), Data science, Information retrieval, Statistics, Computer science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Statistics and Analysis of Abstract Information Included in Chinese Science Abstracts in 2009 — Research Paper | ScholarLens