Controlled studies of clinical effectiveness of fluoxetine combined with Olanzapine in depression
Zheng Hua
Abstract
Zheng Hua
Abstract
Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and side effects of fluoxetine combined with olanzapine in depression. Methods: 44 patients with depression (met CCMD-3 diagnostic criteria) were randomly divided into two groups: research group that was given fluoxetine with olanzapine, and controlled group single fluoxetine, dosage of fluoxetine was 20mg/d and olanzapine 2.5mg/d for 6 weeks. Effectiveness and side effects were rated using HAMD and TESS respectively. Results: After 6-week treatment, the excellent rate of the research group was 86.04% and that of the controlled 59.1%, which showed marked difference ( P 0.05),there was significant difference in score-reducing rates of HAMD at the ends of 2nd and 6th weeks between the two groups ( P 0.05 and P 0.01) and no difference of TESS ( P 0.05). Conclusions: The effectiveness of research group is better than that of controlled group in the treatment of depression, and the side effects of the former don't increase.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and side effects of fluoxetine combined with olanzapine in depression. Methods: 44 patients with depression (met CCMD-3 diagnostic criteria) were randomly divided into two groups: research group that was given fluoxetine with olanzapine, and controlled group single fluoxetine, dosage of fluoxetine was 20mg/d and olanzapine 2.5mg/d for 6 weeks. Effectiveness and side effects were rated using HAMD and TESS respectively. Results: After 6-week treatment, the excellent rate of the research group was 86.04% and that of the controlled 59.1%, which showed marked difference ( P 0.05),there was significant difference in score-reducing rates of HAMD at the ends of 2nd and 6th weeks between the two groups ( P 0.05 and P 0.01) and no difference of TESS ( P 0.05). Conclusions: The effectiveness of research group is better than that of controlled group in the treatment of depression, and the side effects of the former don't increase.
Key concepts: Hamd, Fluoxetine, Olanzapine, Depression (economics), Significant difference, Psychology, Medicine, Internal medicine