2011The Journal of Pharmaceutical PracticeRequires access

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three kinds of nucleoside analogues for chronic hepatitis B

Lin Jing-shi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate economic effects of three kinds of nucleoside analogues in treatment of chronic hepatitis B.Methods 268 cases were divided into three groups,ADV group with adefovir dipivoxil 10mg,ETV group with entecavir 0.5 mg, LdT group with telbivudine 600 mg.All the groups were administered once a day with a course of 48 weeks.Efficacy and adverse reactions were observed.Cost-effectiveness analysis was used.Results ETV group and LdT group were better than ADV group in terms of HBV-DNA negative conversion rate(P0.01),in HBeAg negative conversion rate and ALT normalization rate,three groups showed no statistically significant differences(P0.05),The adverse reactions of three groups had no significant difference(P0.05).The effectiveness ratio of ADV group,ETV group,LdT group was 115.38,156.51,96.98 respectively.Telbivudine was superior to adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir in terms of economics.Conclution Telbivudine group was the optimal solution for chronic hepatitis B.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate economic effects of three kinds of nucleoside analogues in treatment of chronic hepatitis B.Methods 268 cases were divided into three groups,ADV group with adefovir dipivoxil 10mg,ETV group with entecavir 0.5 mg, LdT group with telbivudine 600 mg.All the groups were administered once a day with a course of 48 weeks.Efficacy and adverse reactions were observed.Cost-effectiveness analysis was used.Results ETV group and LdT group were better than ADV group in terms of HBV-DNA negative conversion rate(P0.01),in HBeAg negative conversion rate and ALT normalization rate,three groups showed no statistically significant differences(P0.05),The adverse reactions of three groups had no significant difference(P0.05).The effectiveness ratio of ADV group,ETV group,LdT group was 115.38,156.51,96.98 respectively.Telbivudine was superior to adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir in terms of economics.Conclution Telbivudine group was the optimal solution for chronic hepatitis B.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate economic effects of three kinds of nucleoside analogues in treatment of chronic hepatitis B.Methods 268 cases were divided into three groups,ADV group with adefovir dipivoxil 10mg,ETV group with entecavir 0.5 mg, LdT group with telbivudine 600 mg.All the groups were administered once a day with a course of 48 weeks.Efficacy and adverse reactions were observed.Cost-effectiveness analysis was used.Results ETV group and LdT group were better than ADV group in terms of HBV-DNA negative conversion rate(P0.01),in HBeAg negative conversion rate and ALT normalization rate,three groups showed no statistically significant differences(P0.05),The adverse reactions of three groups had no significant difference(P0.05).The effectiveness ratio of ADV group,ETV group,LdT group was 115.38,156.51,96.98 respectively.Telbivudine was superior to adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir in terms of economics.Conclution Telbivudine group was the optimal solution for chronic hepatitis B.

Key concepts: Adefovir, Telbivudine, Entecavir, Chronic hepatitis, Medicine, HBeAg, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three kinds of nucleoside analogues for chronic hepatitis B — Research Paper | ScholarLens