On theArbitrariness and Iconicity of Linguistic Signs
Ma Xiaohu
Abstract
Ma Xiaohu
Abstract
There is a controversy about the nature of linguistic signs:arbitrariness or iconicity in the academia.Since the cognitive linguistics sprang up,some linguists have asserted that iconicity is the most fundamental feature of linguistic signs.Criticisms about arbitrariness increase.In fact,saussure's arbitrariness and peirce's iconicity are based on different theories with different definitions of linguistic signs,putting emphasis on different levels of language.Thus,there is no comparability between them.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
There is a controversy about the nature of linguistic signs:arbitrariness or iconicity in the academia.Since the cognitive linguistics sprang up,some linguists have asserted that iconicity is the most fundamental feature of linguistic signs.Criticisms about arbitrariness increase.In fact,saussure's arbitrariness and peirce's iconicity are based on different theories with different definitions of linguistic signs,putting emphasis on different levels of language.Thus,there is no comparability between them.
Key concepts: Iconicity, Arbitrariness, Linguistics, Philosophy