2008Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi UniversityRequires access

The Dispute between Arbitrariness and Iconicity of Linguistic Signs and Its Nature

Liping Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A broad survey of the disputes in the field of linguistics in China of the past 20 years shows that three theories stand out concerning the nature of i.e. the theory of arbitrariness, the theory of and the dialectic theory. The disputes mainly focus on the different interpretations of and iconicity, whether the two are the two complete opposites, and whether the relationship between sound and meaning is absolutely arbitrary, etc. To a large degree, the nature of the disputes between arbitrariness and of signs is different interpretations of linguistic signs, and iconicity under different philosophical backgrounds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A broad survey of the disputes in the field of linguistics in China of the past 20 years shows that three theories stand out concerning the nature of i.e. the theory of arbitrariness, the theory of and the dialectic theory. The disputes mainly focus on the different interpretations of and iconicity, whether the two are the two complete opposites, and whether the relationship between sound and meaning is absolutely arbitrary, etc. To a large degree, the nature of the disputes between arbitrariness and of signs is different interpretations of linguistic signs, and iconicity under different philosophical backgrounds.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A broad survey of the disputes in the field of linguistics in China of the past 20 years shows that three theories stand out concerning the nature of i.e. the theory of arbitrariness, the theory of and the dialectic theory. The disputes mainly focus on the different interpretations of and iconicity, whether the two are the two complete opposites, and whether the relationship between sound and meaning is absolutely arbitrary, etc. To a large degree, the nature of the disputes between arbitrariness and of signs is different interpretations of linguistic signs, and iconicity under different philosophical backgrounds.

Key concepts: Arbitrariness, Iconicity, Linguistics, Dialectic, Focus (optics), Meaning (existential), Epistemology, Semiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Dispute between Arbitrariness and Iconicity of Linguistic Signs and Its Nature — Research Paper | ScholarLens