2013The Chinese Journal of Human SexualityRequires access

Clinical efficacy comparison: laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy

YU Xiao-qin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy between laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy.Methods: 152 patients with uterine fibroid from January 2008 to January 2012 were studied.The patients were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group,76 patients in each group.The experimental group were treated with laparoscopic myomectomy,the control group were treated with abdominal myomectomy.Results: The bleeding volume of the experimental group patients was significantly less than that of the control group(P0.05).The surgery time,exhaust time and hospital stay of the experimental group were significantly shorter than those of the control group(P0.05).The incidence rate of complications of the experimental group patients(6.6%) was significantly lower than that of the control group(30.3%)(P0.05).Conclusions: Laparoscopic myomectomy is worthy of clinical application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy between laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy.Methods: 152 patients with uterine fibroid from January 2008 to January 2012 were studied.The patients were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group,76 patients in each group.The experimental group were treated with laparoscopic myomectomy,the control group were treated with abdominal myomectomy.Results: The bleeding volume of the experimental group patients was significantly less than that of the control group(P0.05).The surgery time,exhaust time and hospital stay of the experimental group were significantly shorter than those of the control group(P0.05).The incidence rate of complications of the experimental group patients(6.6%) was significantly lower than that of the control group(30.3%)(P0.05).Conclusions: Laparoscopic myomectomy is worthy of clinical application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy between laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy.Methods: 152 patients with uterine fibroid from January 2008 to January 2012 were studied.The patients were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group,76 patients in each group.The experimental group were treated with laparoscopic myomectomy,the control group were treated with abdominal myomectomy.Results: The bleeding volume of the experimental group patients was significantly less than that of the control group(P0.05).The surgery time,exhaust time and hospital stay of the experimental group were significantly shorter than those of the control group(P0.05).The incidence rate of complications of the experimental group patients(6.6%) was significantly lower than that of the control group(30.3%)(P0.05).Conclusions: Laparoscopic myomectomy is worthy of clinical application.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Clinical efficacy, Uterine fibroids, Uterine myomectomy, Myoma, Uterus, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical efficacy comparison: laparoscopic myomectomy and abdominal myomectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens