2004Journal of Henan Normal UniversityRequires access

A Comparison Between Literary Narrative and Historical Narrative

LI Feng-liang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Scholars of the humanities regard the relations and differences between literature and history as a controversial issue for years. This paper tries to trace back the different concepts about literary narrative and historical narrative, and establish a theoretical starting point for the comparison between them. The author firstly analyzes the meanings of History and Historical Philosophy. On this basis, through a review of thoughts of different schools especially of the new-historicism, the author discusses the similarities in narrative interests and fictitious methods of literature and history, and the differences in the narrative contents. The author points out that the comprehensive relations of literature and history will take new methodology for the literary studies in the 21th century.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scholars of the humanities regard the relations and differences between literature and history as a controversial issue for years. This paper tries to trace back the different concepts about literary narrative and historical narrative, and establish a theoretical starting point for the comparison between them. The author firstly analyzes the meanings of History and Historical Philosophy. On this basis, through a review of thoughts of different schools especially of the new-historicism, the author discusses the similarities in narrative interests and fictitious methods of literature and history, and the differences in the narrative contents. The author points out that the comprehensive relations of literature and history will take new methodology for the literary studies in the 21th century.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scholars of the humanities regard the relations and differences between literature and history as a controversial issue for years. This paper tries to trace back the different concepts about literary narrative and historical narrative, and establish a theoretical starting point for the comparison between them. The author firstly analyzes the meanings of History and Historical Philosophy. On this basis, through a review of thoughts of different schools especially of the new-historicism, the author discusses the similarities in narrative interests and fictitious methods of literature and history, and the differences in the narrative contents. The author points out that the comprehensive relations of literature and history will take new methodology for the literary studies in the 21th century.

Key concepts: Narrative, TRACE (psycholinguistics), Historicism, Narrative criticism, Narrative history, Narrative network, Literature, History of literature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison Between Literary Narrative and Historical Narrative — Research Paper | ScholarLens