2013Chinese Journal of New Clinical MedicineRequires access

Comparison of lumbar anesthesia with different concentration of bupivacaine for second caesarean section

Liang Ju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate optimal concentration of bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in undergoing second cesarean section.Methods Sixty patients who underwent the second caesarean section with spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Every group involved 30 cases. Group A received 7.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia; group B received 7.5 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine. The anaesthetic effects and side effects were compared between the two groups.Results The effective time, anesthesia level, the operation time and newborn Apgar score had no distinct difference between two groups. The usage rate of lidocaine in group A were less than those in group B(P0.05). The anaesthetic effects in group A was better than that in group B(P0.05).Conclusion 0.5% bupivacaine is more effective and safe than 0.25% bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in second cesarean section.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate optimal concentration of bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in undergoing second cesarean section.Methods Sixty patients who underwent the second caesarean section with spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Every group involved 30 cases. Group A received 7.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia; group B received 7.5 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine. The anaesthetic effects and side effects were compared between the two groups.Results The effective time, anesthesia level, the operation time and newborn Apgar score had no distinct difference between two groups. The usage rate of lidocaine in group A were less than those in group B(P0.05). The anaesthetic effects in group A was better than that in group B(P0.05).Conclusion 0.5% bupivacaine is more effective and safe than 0.25% bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in second cesarean section.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate optimal concentration of bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in undergoing second cesarean section.Methods Sixty patients who underwent the second caesarean section with spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Every group involved 30 cases. Group A received 7.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia; group B received 7.5 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine. The anaesthetic effects and side effects were compared between the two groups.Results The effective time, anesthesia level, the operation time and newborn Apgar score had no distinct difference between two groups. The usage rate of lidocaine in group A were less than those in group B(P0.05). The anaesthetic effects in group A was better than that in group B(P0.05).Conclusion 0.5% bupivacaine is more effective and safe than 0.25% bupivacaine for lumbar anesthesia in second cesarean section.

Key concepts: Medicine, Bupivacaine, Anesthesia, Caesarean section, Lumbar, Lidocaine, Group B, Apgar score

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of lumbar anesthesia with different concentration of bupivacaine for second caesarean section — Research Paper | ScholarLens