2010Zhongguo pu-wai jichu yu linchuang zazhiRequires access

Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Versus Needle Aspiration in Management of Bacterial Liver Abscess

Jiafen Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To determine the effectiveness of percutaneous catheter drainage(PCD) and to compare PCD with percutaneous needle aspiration(PNA) in the management of bacterial liver abscess.Methods The medical records of 206 patients with bacterial liver abscess admitted to this hospital between January 1989 and December 2009 were analyzed retrospectively.The outcomes of 96 patients receiving percutaneous treatment including PCD(PCD group,n=56) and PNA(PNA group,n=40) were compared,including the length of hospital stay,rates of procedure-related complications,treatment success,and death.Results There was no statistical difference in patients' demographics or abscess characteristics between two groups(P0.05).The morbidity,mortality,and length of hospital stay in the PCD group and the PNA group were 1.79% vs 2.50%,1.79% vs 2.50%,and(19.2±13.1) d vs(20.2±12.9) d,respectively,and the P values were 1.000,1.000,and 0.887,respectively.There was statistically significant difference in successful rate between two groups(96.43% vs 75.00%,P=0.002),but all simple abscesses with diameter of 5 cm or less were successfully managed in both PNA group and PCD group(13/13 vs 16/17,P=1.000).Conclusions PCD is more effective than PNA in the management of bacterial liver abscess.PNA can be used as a valid alternative for simple abscesses with 5 cm in diameter or smaller.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To determine the effectiveness of percutaneous catheter drainage(PCD) and to compare PCD with percutaneous needle aspiration(PNA) in the management of bacterial liver abscess.Methods The medical records of 206 patients with bacterial liver abscess admitted to this hospital between January 1989 and December 2009 were analyzed retrospectively.The outcomes of 96 patients receiving percutaneous treatment including PCD(PCD group,n=56) and PNA(PNA group,n=40) were compared,including the length of hospital stay,rates of procedure-related complications,treatment success,and death.Results There was no statistical difference in patients' demographics or abscess characteristics between two groups(P0.05).The morbidity,mortality,and length of hospital stay in the PCD group and the PNA group were 1.79% vs 2.50%,1.79% vs 2.50%,and(19.2±13.1) d vs(20.2±12.9) d,respectively,and the P values were 1.000,1.000,and 0.887,respectively.There was statistically significant difference in successful rate between two groups(96.43% vs 75.00%,P=0.002),but all simple abscesses with diameter of 5 cm or less were successfully managed in both PNA group and PCD group(13/13 vs 16/17,P=1.000).Conclusions PCD is more effective than PNA in the management of bacterial liver abscess.PNA can be used as a valid alternative for simple abscesses with 5 cm in diameter or smaller.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To determine the effectiveness of percutaneous catheter drainage(PCD) and to compare PCD with percutaneous needle aspiration(PNA) in the management of bacterial liver abscess.Methods The medical records of 206 patients with bacterial liver abscess admitted to this hospital between January 1989 and December 2009 were analyzed retrospectively.The outcomes of 96 patients receiving percutaneous treatment including PCD(PCD group,n=56) and PNA(PNA group,n=40) were compared,including the length of hospital stay,rates of procedure-related complications,treatment success,and death.Results There was no statistical difference in patients' demographics or abscess characteristics between two groups(P0.05).The morbidity,mortality,and length of hospital stay in the PCD group and the PNA group were 1.79% vs 2.50%,1.79% vs 2.50%,and(19.2±13.1) d vs(20.2±12.9) d,respectively,and the P values were 1.000,1.000,and 0.887,respectively.There was statistically significant difference in successful rate between two groups(96.43% vs 75.00%,P=0.002),but all simple abscesses with diameter of 5 cm or less were successfully managed in both PNA group and PCD group(13/13 vs 16/17,P=1.000).Conclusions PCD is more effective than PNA in the management of bacterial liver abscess.PNA can be used as a valid alternative for simple abscesses with 5 cm in diameter or smaller.

Key concepts: Percutaneous, Medicine, Liver abscess, Abscess, Demographics, Surgery, Catheter, Microbiological culture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Versus Needle Aspiration in Management of Bacterial Liver Abscess — Research Paper | ScholarLens