2018ANZ Journal of SurgeryRequires access

Prospective randomized comparative study of pigtail catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration in treatment of liver abscess

Mukesh Kulhari, Rajendra Mandia

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized comparative study is designed to compare outcomes of ultrasonography-guided pigtail catheter drainage (PCD) and needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses in terms of days to achieve clinical improvement, 50% reduction in cavity size and duration of hospital stay. METHODS: This is a hospital-based comparative study conducted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur, India, from May 2015 to May 2017. Sample size was calculated to be 95 subjects in each of the two groups at α error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Independent t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients of liver abscess were included in this study and we treated 95 patients with percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) and remaining patients with PCD along with systemic antibiotics. Mean time for clinical improvement in PNA group (6.96 ± 1.33 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.22 ± 1.25 days). The mean time for reduction of cavity size to 50% of original size in PNA group (7.05 ± 1.25 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.43 ± 1.27 days). Mean hospital stay of patients in PNA group (12.9 ± 4.02 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (11.44 ± 4.15 days). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is a better modality as compared to PNA especially in larger abscesses which are partially liquefied.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized comparative study is designed to compare outcomes of ultrasonography-guided pigtail catheter drainage (PCD) and needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses in terms of days to achieve clinical improvement, 50% reduction in cavity size and duration of hospital stay. METHODS: This is a hospital-based comparative study conducted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur, India, from May 2015 to May 2017. Sample size was calculated to be 95 subjects in each of the two groups at α error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Independent t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients of liver abscess were included in this study and we treated 95 patients with percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) and remaining patients with PCD along with systemic antibiotics. Mean time for clinical improvement in PNA group (6.96 ± 1.33 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.22 ± 1.25 days). The mean time for reduction of cavity size to 50% of original size in PNA group (7.05 ± 1.25 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.43 ± 1.27 days). Mean hospital stay of patients in PNA group (12.9 ± 4.02 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (11.44 ± 4.15 days). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is a better modality as compared to PNA especially in larger abscesses which are partially liquefied.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized comparative study is designed to compare outcomes of ultrasonography-guided pigtail catheter drainage (PCD) and needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses in terms of days to achieve clinical improvement, 50% reduction in cavity size and duration of hospital stay. METHODS: This is a hospital-based comparative study conducted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur, India, from May 2015 to May 2017. Sample size was calculated to be 95 subjects in each of the two groups at α error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Independent t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients of liver abscess were included in this study and we treated 95 patients with percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) and remaining patients with PCD along with systemic antibiotics. Mean time for clinical improvement in PNA group (6.96 ± 1.33 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.22 ± 1.25 days). The mean time for reduction of cavity size to 50% of original size in PNA group (7.05 ± 1.25 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (4.43 ± 1.27 days). Mean hospital stay of patients in PNA group (12.9 ± 4.02 days) was higher as compared to PCD group (11.44 ± 4.15 days). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is a better modality as compared to PNA especially in larger abscesses which are partially liquefied.

Key concepts: Medicine, Percutaneous, Liver abscess, Surgery, Catheter, Abscess, Drainage, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prospective randomized comparative study of pigtail catheter drainage versus percutaneous needle aspiration in treatment of liver abscess — Research Paper | ScholarLens