2012Zhongguo yaofangRequires access

Study on Bioequivalence of 2 Kinds of Memantine Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Aidong Wen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 2 kinds of Memantine tablets from different manufacturers.METHODS:In standard two step cross-design self-controlled trials,20 healthy male volunteers were randomly divided into 2 groups.2 groups orally took a single dose of 10 mg tablets of the test preparation (domestic tablet) and reference preparation (imported tablet).The plasma concentration of memantine was determined by LC-MS,and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using DAS 2.0 software.RESULTS:The pharmacokinetic parameters of reference and test preparations were as follows:t1/2 were (69.77±14.61)h vs.(76.06±17.92)h;tmax(5.15±1.18)h vs.(5.05±1.36)h;cmax(13.64±3.28)μg·mL-1 vs.(13.34±4.18)μg·mL-1;AUC0~240 h(857.73±164.45)μg·h·mL-1 vs.(888.16±316) μg·h·mL-1;AUC0~∞(940.00±180.70)μg·h·mL-1 vs.(999.00±346.40)μg·h·mL-1,respectively.The relative bioavailability of test preparation was 104.2%,compared with reference preparation.CONCLUSION:2 kinds of Memantine tablets are bioequivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 2 kinds of Memantine tablets from different manufacturers.METHODS:In standard two step cross-design self-controlled trials,20 healthy male volunteers were randomly divided into 2 groups.2 groups orally took a single dose of 10 mg tablets of the test preparation (domestic tablet) and reference preparation (imported tablet).The plasma concentration of memantine was determined by LC-MS,and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using DAS 2.0 software.RESULTS:The pharmacokinetic parameters of reference and test preparations were as follows:t1/2 were (69.77±14.61)h vs.(76.06±17.92)h;tmax(5.15±1.18)h vs.(5.05±1.36)h;cmax(13.64±3.28)μg·mL-1 vs.(13.34±4.18)μg·mL-1;AUC0~240 h(857.73±164.45)μg·h·mL-1 vs.(888.16±316) μg·h·mL-1;AUC0~∞(940.00±180.70)μg·h·mL-1 vs.(999.00±346.40)μg·h·mL-1,respectively.The relative bioavailability of test preparation was 104.2%,compared with reference preparation.CONCLUSION:2 kinds of Memantine tablets are bioequivalent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 2 kinds of Memantine tablets from different manufacturers.METHODS:In standard two step cross-design self-controlled trials,20 healthy male volunteers were randomly divided into 2 groups.2 groups orally took a single dose of 10 mg tablets of the test preparation (domestic tablet) and reference preparation (imported tablet).The plasma concentration of memantine was determined by LC-MS,and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using DAS 2.0 software.RESULTS:The pharmacokinetic parameters of reference and test preparations were as follows:t1/2 were (69.77±14.61)h vs.(76.06±17.92)h;tmax(5.15±1.18)h vs.(5.05±1.36)h;cmax(13.64±3.28)μg·mL-1 vs.(13.34±4.18)μg·mL-1;AUC0~240 h(857.73±164.45)μg·h·mL-1 vs.(888.16±316) μg·h·mL-1;AUC0~∞(940.00±180.70)μg·h·mL-1 vs.(999.00±346.40)μg·h·mL-1,respectively.The relative bioavailability of test preparation was 104.2%,compared with reference preparation.CONCLUSION:2 kinds of Memantine tablets are bioequivalent.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Cmax, Pharmacology, Memantine, Medicine, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on Bioequivalence of 2 Kinds of Memantine Tablets in Healthy Volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens