2009Journal of Capital Medical UniversityRequires access

Comparison between Propofol and Sevoflurane during Operation with Suspension Laryngoscopy

Tianzuo Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare propofol with sevoflurane with remifentanil target-controlled infusion(TCI) respectively during operation of suspension laryngoscopy.Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients scheduled for the vocal cord surgery through suspension laryngoscopy were randomly divided into two groups:Propofol group(P group) and Sevoflurane group(S group),20 cases in each.Both groups were induced with intravenous midazolam 1.0~1.5 mg,succinylcholine 1.5~2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 4 μg/L in TCI.P group was induced with Propofol 3 μg/ml in TCI and S group with intravenous propofol 1.5~2.0 mg/kg.After intubation,patients in S group inhaled 2%~4% sevoflurane to get sevoflurane concentration to 1 MAC,and combined with remifentanil in TCI.Patients in P group were maintained with remifentanil and propofol in TCI.HR and MAP at different time point,waking time,extubation time and side effects were recorded and compared.Results In both groups after induction,the HR at T1(1 min after induction) declined as compared with T0(before operation)(P0.05),and MAP at T1 and T2(1 min after intubation) declined as compared with T0(P0.05).But HR in P group at T1,T2 and T7(operation finished) declined more significantly than that in S group(P0.05).While waking time and extubation time in S group were shorter than in P group(P0.05).Conclusion Both methods of anaethesia can achieve good effect in the suspension laryngoscopy,but the patients maintained with sevoflurane had more stable hemodynamics and recovered sooner.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare propofol with sevoflurane with remifentanil target-controlled infusion(TCI) respectively during operation of suspension laryngoscopy.Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients scheduled for the vocal cord surgery through suspension laryngoscopy were randomly divided into two groups:Propofol group(P group) and Sevoflurane group(S group),20 cases in each.Both groups were induced with intravenous midazolam 1.0~1.5 mg,succinylcholine 1.5~2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 4 μg/L in TCI.P group was induced with Propofol 3 μg/ml in TCI and S group with intravenous propofol 1.5~2.0 mg/kg.After intubation,patients in S group inhaled 2%~4% sevoflurane to get sevoflurane concentration to 1 MAC,and combined with remifentanil in TCI.Patients in P group were maintained with remifentanil and propofol in TCI.HR and MAP at different time point,waking time,extubation time and side effects were recorded and compared.Results In both groups after induction,the HR at T1(1 min after induction) declined as compared with T0(before operation)(P0.05),and MAP at T1 and T2(1 min after intubation) declined as compared with T0(P0.05).But HR in P group at T1,T2 and T7(operation finished) declined more significantly than that in S group(P0.05).While waking time and extubation time in S group were shorter than in P group(P0.05).Conclusion Both methods of anaethesia can achieve good effect in the suspension laryngoscopy,but the patients maintained with sevoflurane had more stable hemodynamics and recovered sooner.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare propofol with sevoflurane with remifentanil target-controlled infusion(TCI) respectively during operation of suspension laryngoscopy.Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients scheduled for the vocal cord surgery through suspension laryngoscopy were randomly divided into two groups:Propofol group(P group) and Sevoflurane group(S group),20 cases in each.Both groups were induced with intravenous midazolam 1.0~1.5 mg,succinylcholine 1.5~2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 4 μg/L in TCI.P group was induced with Propofol 3 μg/ml in TCI and S group with intravenous propofol 1.5~2.0 mg/kg.After intubation,patients in S group inhaled 2%~4% sevoflurane to get sevoflurane concentration to 1 MAC,and combined with remifentanil in TCI.Patients in P group were maintained with remifentanil and propofol in TCI.HR and MAP at different time point,waking time,extubation time and side effects were recorded and compared.Results In both groups after induction,the HR at T1(1 min after induction) declined as compared with T0(before operation)(P0.05),and MAP at T1 and T2(1 min after intubation) declined as compared with T0(P0.05).But HR in P group at T1,T2 and T7(operation finished) declined more significantly than that in S group(P0.05).While waking time and extubation time in S group were shorter than in P group(P0.05).Conclusion Both methods of anaethesia can achieve good effect in the suspension laryngoscopy,but the patients maintained with sevoflurane had more stable hemodynamics and recovered sooner.

Key concepts: Propofol, Sevoflurane, Remifentanil, Anesthesia, Laryngoscopy, Medicine, Intubation, Midazolam

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between Propofol and Sevoflurane during Operation with Suspension Laryngoscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens