ScholarLens Back to search
1972•Unpublished venueRequires access

Elimination of scattered residual saplings left after clearcut harvesting of Appalachian hardwoods

George R. Trimble, Robert L. Rosier

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Basal-spraying and power-saw felling were compared as methods for eliminating the 1- to 5-inch d.b.h. understory stems left after clearcutting. Felling leaves the area more esthetically acceptable, and costs are lower.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Basal-spraying and power-saw felling were compared as methods for eliminating the 1- to 5-inch d.b.h. understory stems left after clearcutting. Felling leaves the area more esthetically acceptable, and costs are lower.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Basal-spraying and power-saw felling were compared as methods for eliminating the 1- to 5-inch d.b.h. understory stems left after clearcutting. Felling leaves the area more esthetically acceptable, and costs are lower.

Key concepts: Felling, Clearcutting, Understory, Basal area, Prescribed burn, Logging, Forestry, Veneer

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Elimination of scattered residual saplings left after clearcut harvesting of Appalachian hardwoods — Research Paper | ScholarLens