1986•Unpublished venueOpen access

Allegheny hardwood regeneration response to even-age harvesting methods

John C. Bjorkbom, Russell S. Walters, Russell S. Walters

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

Allegheny hardwood regeneration response to block clearcutting, alternate strip clearcutting, and two-cut shelterwood, and in an uncut control was compared.Stand regeneration success was evaluated 5 years after harvest.Clearcutting resulted in high mortality of advance regeneration.Thus, regeneration by block clearcutting was not successful, though both alternate strip clearcutting harvests were successful.The first cut of the shelterwood established new seedlings but did not stimulate growth.Regeneration level increased from inadequate to adequate and remained so after the final harvest.New seedlings appeared in the control after each seed crop, but few survived.Fenced seedlings grew taller in all harvest areas.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Allegheny hardwood regeneration response to block clearcutting, alternate strip clearcutting, and two-cut shelterwood, and in an uncut control was compared.Stand regeneration success was evaluated 5 years after harvest.Clearcutting resulted in high mortality of advance regeneration.Thus, regeneration by block clearcutting was not successful, though both alternate strip clearcutting harvests were successful.The first cut of the shelterwood established new seedlings but did not stimulate growth.Regeneration level increased from inadequate to adequate and remained so after the final harvest.New seedlings appeared in the control after each seed crop, but few survived.Fenced seedlings grew taller in all harvest areas.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Allegheny hardwood regeneration response to block clearcutting, alternate strip clearcutting, and two-cut shelterwood, and in an uncut control was compared.Stand regeneration success was evaluated 5 years after harvest.Clearcutting resulted in high mortality of advance regeneration.Thus, regeneration by block clearcutting was not successful, though both alternate strip clearcutting harvests were successful.The first cut of the shelterwood established new seedlings but did not stimulate growth.Regeneration level increased from inadequate to adequate and remained so after the final harvest.New seedlings appeared in the control after each seed crop, but few survived.Fenced seedlings grew taller in all harvest areas.

Key concepts: Hardwood, Regeneration (biology), Environmental science, Biology, Ecology, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Allegheny hardwood regeneration response to even-age harvesting methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens