2008Chinese Journal of Optometry & OphthalmologyRequires access

The differences in accommodative responses during RSVP reading in groups with different refractive errors

Rongrong Le

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the accommodative responses in progressive myopes, stable myopes and emmetropes when reading. Methods The accommodative responses of the left eye were measured with a Grand SEIKO-WV 500 autorefractor in 45 subjects (15 progressive myopes, 15 stable myopes and 15 emmetropes). Excerpts from Chinese novels were used as reading material and presented by rapid serial visual presentation with one character at a time on a computer screen at a distance of 25 cm. A 9-point character size was presented at a rate of 150 characters/minute. Results All of the subjects showed some accommodative lag with the same accommodative stimuli of 4 D but had large individual variability. The accommodative responses for progressive myopes were lower than that for emmetropes [(2.32±0.43)D vs (3.19±0.53)D,P0.01]. The accommodative responses for progressive myopes were also lower than that for stable myopes [(2.32±0.43)D vs (3.07±0.34)D,P0.01]. However, there were no significant differences in accommodative responses between emmetropes and stable myopes (P=0.441). Conclusion Progressive myopes show lower accommodative response at near, the high accommodative lag induced retinal image may be linked to myopia development, and the accommodative response will return to normal values when myopia progression stabilizes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the accommodative responses in progressive myopes, stable myopes and emmetropes when reading. Methods The accommodative responses of the left eye were measured with a Grand SEIKO-WV 500 autorefractor in 45 subjects (15 progressive myopes, 15 stable myopes and 15 emmetropes). Excerpts from Chinese novels were used as reading material and presented by rapid serial visual presentation with one character at a time on a computer screen at a distance of 25 cm. A 9-point character size was presented at a rate of 150 characters/minute. Results All of the subjects showed some accommodative lag with the same accommodative stimuli of 4 D but had large individual variability. The accommodative responses for progressive myopes were lower than that for emmetropes [(2.32±0.43)D vs (3.19±0.53)D,P0.01]. The accommodative responses for progressive myopes were also lower than that for stable myopes [(2.32±0.43)D vs (3.07±0.34)D,P0.01]. However, there were no significant differences in accommodative responses between emmetropes and stable myopes (P=0.441). Conclusion Progressive myopes show lower accommodative response at near, the high accommodative lag induced retinal image may be linked to myopia development, and the accommodative response will return to normal values when myopia progression stabilizes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the accommodative responses in progressive myopes, stable myopes and emmetropes when reading. Methods The accommodative responses of the left eye were measured with a Grand SEIKO-WV 500 autorefractor in 45 subjects (15 progressive myopes, 15 stable myopes and 15 emmetropes). Excerpts from Chinese novels were used as reading material and presented by rapid serial visual presentation with one character at a time on a computer screen at a distance of 25 cm. A 9-point character size was presented at a rate of 150 characters/minute. Results All of the subjects showed some accommodative lag with the same accommodative stimuli of 4 D but had large individual variability. The accommodative responses for progressive myopes were lower than that for emmetropes [(2.32±0.43)D vs (3.19±0.53)D,P0.01]. The accommodative responses for progressive myopes were also lower than that for stable myopes [(2.32±0.43)D vs (3.07±0.34)D,P0.01]. However, there were no significant differences in accommodative responses between emmetropes and stable myopes (P=0.441). Conclusion Progressive myopes show lower accommodative response at near, the high accommodative lag induced retinal image may be linked to myopia development, and the accommodative response will return to normal values when myopia progression stabilizes.

Key concepts: Autorefractor, Optometry, Reading (process), Refractive error, Psychology, Ophthalmology, Audiology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The differences in accommodative responses during RSVP reading in groups with different refractive errors — Research Paper | ScholarLens