2012心血管病防治知识(学术版)Requires access

Comparative study on echocardiography and electrocardiography in diagnosis of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy

Gao Ru-fen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore and compare the clinical values of echocardiography and electrocardiography in the diagnosis of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.Methods Retrospective analysis based on echocardiographic and electrocardiographic data was performed on 151 patients with hypertension who were admitted to our hospital from May 2009 to February 2012.The two examination tools were compared with respect to the detection rate of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.Results The detection rate by echocardiography(64.2%,97 positive cases and 54 negative cases) was significantly higher than that by electrocardiography(39.1%,59 positive cases and 92 negative cases)(P0.05).Conclusion Echocardiography can achieve higher detection rate of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiogram,so it can be primary clinical choice for non-invasive examination of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore and compare the clinical values of echocardiography and electrocardiography in the diagnosis of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.Methods Retrospective analysis based on echocardiographic and electrocardiographic data was performed on 151 patients with hypertension who were admitted to our hospital from May 2009 to February 2012.The two examination tools were compared with respect to the detection rate of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.Results The detection rate by echocardiography(64.2%,97 positive cases and 54 negative cases) was significantly higher than that by electrocardiography(39.1%,59 positive cases and 92 negative cases)(P0.05).Conclusion Echocardiography can achieve higher detection rate of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiogram,so it can be primary clinical choice for non-invasive examination of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore and compare the clinical values of echocardiography and electrocardiography in the diagnosis of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.Methods Retrospective analysis based on echocardiographic and electrocardiographic data was performed on 151 patients with hypertension who were admitted to our hospital from May 2009 to February 2012.The two examination tools were compared with respect to the detection rate of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.Results The detection rate by echocardiography(64.2%,97 positive cases and 54 negative cases) was significantly higher than that by electrocardiography(39.1%,59 positive cases and 92 negative cases)(P0.05).Conclusion Echocardiography can achieve higher detection rate of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy than electrocardiogram,so it can be primary clinical choice for non-invasive examination of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

Key concepts: Left ventricular hypertrophy, Medicine, Electrocardiography, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Muscle hypertrophy, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study on echocardiography and electrocardiography in diagnosis of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy — Research Paper | ScholarLens