2004Zhejiang Medical JournalRequires access

A comparative study of treatment of depression, Mirtazapine vs. fluoxepine

Shaohua Hu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine with fluoxetine in treatment of depression. Methods Forty seven patients with depression were divided into two groups, 24 patients were treated with mirtazapine ,29.6±10.2 mg,day, and 23 patients with fluoxetine ,34.4±8.3 mg,day, for 6 weeks respectively. Hamilton Depression Scale ,HAMD, and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale ,TESS, were used before treatment and 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after treatment to assess the therapeutic efficacy and side effects. Results ,1, The HAMD scores for both groups were significantly decreased after treatment ,P0.01,. ,2, The decreasing rates of HAMD scores between two groups were significantly different ,P0.01, at all time points from the end of first week, ,3, At the end of the 6th week, the efficacy rate of mirtazapine and fluoxetine was 91.7% and 87.0% respectively ,P0.05,. ,4, TESS scores indicated that the occurrence of common side effects of mirtazapine was similar to fluoxetine ,P0.05,, but the occurrence rate of drowsiness and weight gain in mirtazapine group was higher that that in fluoxepine group ,P0.05,. Conclusion Mirtazapine is of good efficacy, rapid action, and less side effects in treatment of depression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine with fluoxetine in treatment of depression. Methods Forty seven patients with depression were divided into two groups, 24 patients were treated with mirtazapine ,29.6±10.2 mg,day, and 23 patients with fluoxetine ,34.4±8.3 mg,day, for 6 weeks respectively. Hamilton Depression Scale ,HAMD, and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale ,TESS, were used before treatment and 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after treatment to assess the therapeutic efficacy and side effects. Results ,1, The HAMD scores for both groups were significantly decreased after treatment ,P0.01,. ,2, The decreasing rates of HAMD scores between two groups were significantly different ,P0.01, at all time points from the end of first week, ,3, At the end of the 6th week, the efficacy rate of mirtazapine and fluoxetine was 91.7% and 87.0% respectively ,P0.05,. ,4, TESS scores indicated that the occurrence of common side effects of mirtazapine was similar to fluoxetine ,P0.05,, but the occurrence rate of drowsiness and weight gain in mirtazapine group was higher that that in fluoxepine group ,P0.05,. Conclusion Mirtazapine is of good efficacy, rapid action, and less side effects in treatment of depression.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine with fluoxetine in treatment of depression. Methods Forty seven patients with depression were divided into two groups, 24 patients were treated with mirtazapine ,29.6±10.2 mg,day, and 23 patients with fluoxetine ,34.4±8.3 mg,day, for 6 weeks respectively. Hamilton Depression Scale ,HAMD, and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale ,TESS, were used before treatment and 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after treatment to assess the therapeutic efficacy and side effects. Results ,1, The HAMD scores for both groups were significantly decreased after treatment ,P0.01,. ,2, The decreasing rates of HAMD scores between two groups were significantly different ,P0.01, at all time points from the end of first week, ,3, At the end of the 6th week, the efficacy rate of mirtazapine and fluoxetine was 91.7% and 87.0% respectively ,P0.05,. ,4, TESS scores indicated that the occurrence of common side effects of mirtazapine was similar to fluoxetine ,P0.05,, but the occurrence rate of drowsiness and weight gain in mirtazapine group was higher that that in fluoxepine group ,P0.05,. Conclusion Mirtazapine is of good efficacy, rapid action, and less side effects in treatment of depression.

Key concepts: Mirtazapine, Hamd, Medicine, Fluoxetine, Depression (economics), Hamilton depression scale, Clinical efficacy, Side effect (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of treatment of depression, Mirtazapine vs. fluoxepine — Research Paper | ScholarLens