2006•Shandong Jingcha Xueyuan xuebaoRequires access

A Comparison and Analysis of the System of Prosecution Postponement

Xiaolu Cheng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

As one manifestation of the doctrine of prosecuting discretion,prosecution postponement has been initiated in major developed countries throughout the world.After comparing the systems of prosecution postponement in Germany,Japan and the U.S.,the author finds that the area of application,probationary period,people's acceptance of such a system and the supervision of such a system vary in these three countries.The reasons of these differences lie in the differences in these three countries such as their legal traditions and concepts of prosecution.The current judicial practice in China is very similar to that of Japan and Germany just before the execution of the system of prosecution postponement.Considering our own legal tradition and concept of prosecution,a system of prosecution postponement should be worked out in China so as to extend the area of application in discretionary nos pros.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As one manifestation of the doctrine of prosecuting discretion,prosecution postponement has been initiated in major developed countries throughout the world.After comparing the systems of prosecution postponement in Germany,Japan and the U.S.,the author finds that the area of application,probationary period,people's acceptance of such a system and the supervision of such a system vary in these three countries.The reasons of these differences lie in the differences in these three countries such as their legal traditions and concepts of prosecution.The current judicial practice in China is very similar to that of Japan and Germany just before the execution of the system of prosecution postponement.Considering our own legal tradition and concept of prosecution,a system of prosecution postponement should be worked out in China so as to extend the area of application in discretionary nos pros.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As one manifestation of the doctrine of prosecuting discretion,prosecution postponement has been initiated in major developed countries throughout the world.After comparing the systems of prosecution postponement in Germany,Japan and the U.S.,the author finds that the area of application,probationary period,people's acceptance of such a system and the supervision of such a system vary in these three countries.The reasons of these differences lie in the differences in these three countries such as their legal traditions and concepts of prosecution.The current judicial practice in China is very similar to that of Japan and Germany just before the execution of the system of prosecution postponement.Considering our own legal tradition and concept of prosecution,a system of prosecution postponement should be worked out in China so as to extend the area of application in discretionary nos pros.

Key concepts: Postponement, Discretion, China, Doctrine, Law, Political science, Business, Marketing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison and Analysis of the System of Prosecution Postponement — Research Paper | ScholarLens