2006•Yati yasui yazhoubingxue zazhiRequires access

Prediction of outcome of malocclusion class III after combined maxillary protraction and chin cup aplliance treatment

Liu Wen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM:To investigate the differences in the skeletal morphology between the effective and the ineffective groups treated with same method .METHODS:32 female cases with malocclusion class Ⅲ were chosen and treated by combined protraction and chin cup divided into two groups(the effective and the ineffective group)according to the different treatment results. The cephalograms were taken at the beginning (T1) and after the treatment (T2) .Then the skeletal difference between the two groups was analyzed. RESULTS:At T1,the lower facial height inclination of mandibular plane and gonial angle were larger at the ineffective group.SNA was smaller in the effective group.At T2,the difference between facial height were increased.SNB was difference between two groups.From T1-T2,the effective group express more madibullar anterior displacement. CONCLUSION:Those results indicated that the vertical dimention of the craniofacial skeletal are important for prediction in the treatment of class Ⅲ malocclusion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM:To investigate the differences in the skeletal morphology between the effective and the ineffective groups treated with same method .METHODS:32 female cases with malocclusion class Ⅲ were chosen and treated by combined protraction and chin cup divided into two groups(the effective and the ineffective group)according to the different treatment results. The cephalograms were taken at the beginning (T1) and after the treatment (T2) .Then the skeletal difference between the two groups was analyzed. RESULTS:At T1,the lower facial height inclination of mandibular plane and gonial angle were larger at the ineffective group.SNA was smaller in the effective group.At T2,the difference between facial height were increased.SNB was difference between two groups.From T1-T2,the effective group express more madibullar anterior displacement. CONCLUSION:Those results indicated that the vertical dimention of the craniofacial skeletal are important for prediction in the treatment of class Ⅲ malocclusion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM:To investigate the differences in the skeletal morphology between the effective and the ineffective groups treated with same method .METHODS:32 female cases with malocclusion class Ⅲ were chosen and treated by combined protraction and chin cup divided into two groups(the effective and the ineffective group)according to the different treatment results. The cephalograms were taken at the beginning (T1) and after the treatment (T2) .Then the skeletal difference between the two groups was analyzed. RESULTS:At T1,the lower facial height inclination of mandibular plane and gonial angle were larger at the ineffective group.SNA was smaller in the effective group.At T2,the difference between facial height were increased.SNB was difference between two groups.From T1-T2,the effective group express more madibullar anterior displacement. CONCLUSION:Those results indicated that the vertical dimention of the craniofacial skeletal are important for prediction in the treatment of class Ⅲ malocclusion.

Key concepts: Chin, Gonial angle, Malocclusion, Craniofacial, Medicine, Orthodontics, Dentistry, Cephalometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prediction of outcome of malocclusion class III after combined maxillary protraction and chin cup aplliance treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens