Theoretical Construction of the Principle of Matching Punishment with Crime and Responsibility by the New Criminal Law
Shi Liu
Abstract
Shi Liu
Abstract
This article argues that what is stipulated in clause 5 of the new Criminal Law is not simply the principle of punishment matching with crime, but unifies the principle of punishment matching with crime and the principle of punishment for individual cases with the criminal responsibility as links. To set the punishment, it takes both the criminal acts and the offenders into consideration. Thus, the Criminal Law integrates justice with utility, general precautions with special precautions, cracking down on crimes with safeguarding human rights.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article argues that what is stipulated in clause 5 of the new Criminal Law is not simply the principle of punishment matching with crime, but unifies the principle of punishment matching with crime and the principle of punishment for individual cases with the criminal responsibility as links. To set the punishment, it takes both the criminal acts and the offenders into consideration. Thus, the Criminal Law integrates justice with utility, general precautions with special precautions, cracking down on crimes with safeguarding human rights.
Key concepts: Punishment (psychology), Criminal law, Criminal justice, Safeguarding, Theory of criminal justice, Law, Criminology, Criminal procedure