2014Proceeding of Clinical MedicineRequires access

Comparison of intravenous analgesia with dezocine and sufentanil after radical resection of rectal cancer

Jin Guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of dezocine and sufentanil in patient intravenous analgesia after radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods: Sixty patients arranged for radical resection of rectal cancer were randomly divided into dezocine group( group D) and sufentanil group( group S). After operation two groups were respectively given by intravenous injection( PCA) were decozine 0. 7 mg /kg( group D) and sufentanil 1. 5 μg /kg( group S) which were diluted to 60 mL by Visual Analogue Scale( VAS) and Ramsay scores after operation and adverse effects were recorded and compared. Results: There was no significant difference in the VAS scores( P 0. 05). The Ramsay scores and adverse effects in group D were significantly lower than those in group S( P 0. 05). Conclusion: The postoperative analgesia with dezocine can serve as a safe and effective method of analgesia in patient of radical rectal cancer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To compare the efficacy of dezocine and sufentanil in patient intravenous analgesia after radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods: Sixty patients arranged for radical resection of rectal cancer were randomly divided into dezocine group( group D) and sufentanil group( group S). After operation two groups were respectively given by intravenous injection( PCA) were decozine 0. 7 mg /kg( group D) and sufentanil 1. 5 μg /kg( group S) which were diluted to 60 mL by Visual Analogue Scale( VAS) and Ramsay scores after operation and adverse effects were recorded and compared. Results: There was no significant difference in the VAS scores( P 0. 05). The Ramsay scores and adverse effects in group D were significantly lower than those in group S( P 0. 05). Conclusion: The postoperative analgesia with dezocine can serve as a safe and effective method of analgesia in patient of radical rectal cancer.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of dezocine and sufentanil in patient intravenous analgesia after radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods: Sixty patients arranged for radical resection of rectal cancer were randomly divided into dezocine group( group D) and sufentanil group( group S). After operation two groups were respectively given by intravenous injection( PCA) were decozine 0. 7 mg /kg( group D) and sufentanil 1. 5 μg /kg( group S) which were diluted to 60 mL by Visual Analogue Scale( VAS) and Ramsay scores after operation and adverse effects were recorded and compared. Results: There was no significant difference in the VAS scores( P 0. 05). The Ramsay scores and adverse effects in group D were significantly lower than those in group S( P 0. 05). Conclusion: The postoperative analgesia with dezocine can serve as a safe and effective method of analgesia in patient of radical rectal cancer.

Key concepts: Dezocine, Sufentanil, Medicine, Anesthesia, Visual analogue scale, Colorectal cancer, Surgery, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of intravenous analgesia with dezocine and sufentanil after radical resection of rectal cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens