2012Unpublished venueRequires access

The Clinical Effect Comparison of Hot Gutta-Percha Filling and Cold Gutta-Percha Lateral Condensation in the Teeth Root Canal Filling

Jiang Bu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of hot gutta-percha filling and cold gutta-percha lateral condensation in the teeth root canal filling.Methods: Collect 62 patients with the acute pulpitis and apical periodontitis,they were divided into the hot gutta-percha group and the cold gutta-percha group,then compare the teeth root canal filling time,the postoperative patients with the periodontal pain,the filling quality and the clinical effect after 3 months.Results: There was no statistical significant(P0.05) in the postoperative patients with the periodontal pain,there was a statistical significant(P0.05) in the remaining aspects,the hot gutta-percha group's clinical effect were better than the cold gutta-percha group's.Conclusion: We should use hot gutta-percha filling in the teeth root canal filling first,it could significantly improve the clinical effect and did not increas the incidence of postoperative periodontal pain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of hot gutta-percha filling and cold gutta-percha lateral condensation in the teeth root canal filling.Methods: Collect 62 patients with the acute pulpitis and apical periodontitis,they were divided into the hot gutta-percha group and the cold gutta-percha group,then compare the teeth root canal filling time,the postoperative patients with the periodontal pain,the filling quality and the clinical effect after 3 months.Results: There was no statistical significant(P0.05) in the postoperative patients with the periodontal pain,there was a statistical significant(P0.05) in the remaining aspects,the hot gutta-percha group's clinical effect were better than the cold gutta-percha group's.Conclusion: We should use hot gutta-percha filling in the teeth root canal filling first,it could significantly improve the clinical effect and did not increas the incidence of postoperative periodontal pain.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of hot gutta-percha filling and cold gutta-percha lateral condensation in the teeth root canal filling.Methods: Collect 62 patients with the acute pulpitis and apical periodontitis,they were divided into the hot gutta-percha group and the cold gutta-percha group,then compare the teeth root canal filling time,the postoperative patients with the periodontal pain,the filling quality and the clinical effect after 3 months.Results: There was no statistical significant(P0.05) in the postoperative patients with the periodontal pain,there was a statistical significant(P0.05) in the remaining aspects,the hot gutta-percha group's clinical effect were better than the cold gutta-percha group's.Conclusion: We should use hot gutta-percha filling in the teeth root canal filling first,it could significantly improve the clinical effect and did not increas the incidence of postoperative periodontal pain.

Key concepts: Gutta-percha, Dentistry, Root canal, Medicine, Pulpitis, Periodontitis, Postoperative pain, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Clinical Effect Comparison of Hot Gutta-Percha Filling and Cold Gutta-Percha Lateral Condensation in the Teeth Root Canal Filling — Research Paper | ScholarLens