2002PubMedRequires access

[Mechanism of esophageal speech after total laryngectomy].

Wen Xu, De-min Han, Lizhen Hou, Li Zhang, Shufeng Wang, Zhigang Huang, Zhen-kun Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristics of esophageal speech after total laryngectomy. METHODS: Esophageal speech evaluation of 40 cases of esophageal phonation included acoustic parameters, intraesophageal pressures during phonation, speech intelligibility, fluency, communication, respiratory sound and cognate distinctions between voiced and voiceless sounds. RESULTS: In 8 poor speakers, the neoglottis was spasmodic and difficult to vibrate during phonation. In 32 good speakers, the neoglottis was relaxed and easy to vibrate during phonation. The training age, speech intelligibility, fluency, communication, respiratory sound, cognate distinctions between voiced and voiceless sounds and intraesophageal pressures during phonation were significantly different between good and poor esophageal speakers. Vocal characteristics of good speakers differed significantly from those in the normal (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The upper intraesphageal pressure during esophageal phonation was higher than that of the normal, especially for poor esophageal phonation. The middle to lower intraesphageal pressures was highest during poor esophageal phonation. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal phonation was completely alaryngeal, and its activators also differ completely, so phonation could not maintain much longer. Patients with poor esophageal phonation could not drive the air through the neoglottis freely.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristics of esophageal speech after total laryngectomy. METHODS: Esophageal speech evaluation of 40 cases of esophageal phonation included acoustic parameters, intraesophageal pressures during phonation, speech intelligibility, fluency, communication, respiratory sound and cognate distinctions between voiced and voiceless sounds. RESULTS: In 8 poor speakers, the neoglottis was spasmodic and difficult to vibrate during phonation. In 32 good speakers, the neoglottis was relaxed and easy to vibrate during phonation. The training age, speech intelligibility, fluency, communication, respiratory sound, cognate distinctions between voiced and voiceless sounds and intraesophageal pressures during phonation were significantly different between good and poor esophageal speakers. Vocal characteristics of good speakers differed significantly from those in the normal (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The upper intraesphageal pressure during esophageal phonation was higher than that of the normal, especially for poor esophageal phonation. The middle to lower intraesphageal pressures was highest during poor esophageal phonation. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal phonation was completely alaryngeal, and its activators also differ completely, so phonation could not maintain much longer. Patients with poor esophageal phonation could not drive the air through the neoglottis freely.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristics of esophageal speech after total laryngectomy. METHODS: Esophageal speech evaluation of 40 cases of esophageal phonation included acoustic parameters, intraesophageal pressures during phonation, speech intelligibility, fluency, communication, respiratory sound and cognate distinctions between voiced and voiceless sounds. RESULTS: In 8 poor speakers, the neoglottis was spasmodic and difficult to vibrate during phonation. In 32 good speakers, the neoglottis was relaxed and easy to vibrate during phonation. The training age, speech intelligibility, fluency, communication, respiratory sound, cognate distinctions between voiced and voiceless sounds and intraesophageal pressures during phonation were significantly different between good and poor esophageal speakers. Vocal characteristics of good speakers differed significantly from those in the normal (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The upper intraesphageal pressure during esophageal phonation was higher than that of the normal, especially for poor esophageal phonation. The middle to lower intraesphageal pressures was highest during poor esophageal phonation. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal phonation was completely alaryngeal, and its activators also differ completely, so phonation could not maintain much longer. Patients with poor esophageal phonation could not drive the air through the neoglottis freely.

Key concepts: Phonation, Esophageal speech, Laryngectomy, Medicine, Audiology, Glottis, Intelligibility (philosophy), Larynx

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Mechanism of esophageal speech after total laryngectomy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens