2015Unpublished venueRequires access

The status and development trend of Chinese academic journals evaluation system

Ya Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

[Purpose]The existing academic journals' evaluation system is investigated thoroughly in order to explore its development trend.[Methodology]By analyzing the status and problems of academic journals' evaluation system,a scientific and rational evaluation system is built.[Findings]There are tw o kinds of academic journalsv evaluation system in China.One is based on the assessmentof qualified appraisaland excellent journal evaluation.The other is based on the influenceof core journals' evaluation.These tw o evaluation systems both have certain limitations.Rating agencies in China should integrate and cooperate w ith each other,take advocating academic norms as an important responsibility,in order to establish a unified and normative academic journals' evaluation system suitable for China' s situation.And the evaluation parameter system and methods should be improved constantly.In the selection of evaluation parameters,its role of guiding the quality of journals should be paid more attention to.[Conclusions] The problems in practical applications should be rethought profoundly by various rating agencies and administrations in order to build a real scientific and rational evaluation system of academic journals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Purpose]The existing academic journals' evaluation system is investigated thoroughly in order to explore its development trend.[Methodology]By analyzing the status and problems of academic journals' evaluation system,a scientific and rational evaluation system is built.[Findings]There are tw o kinds of academic journalsv evaluation system in China.One is based on the assessmentof qualified appraisaland excellent journal evaluation.The other is based on the influenceof core journals' evaluation.These tw o evaluation systems both have certain limitations.Rating agencies in China should integrate and cooperate w ith each other,take advocating academic norms as an important responsibility,in order to establish a unified and normative academic journals' evaluation system suitable for China' s situation.And the evaluation parameter system and methods should be improved constantly.In the selection of evaluation parameters,its role of guiding the quality of journals should be paid more attention to.[Conclusions] The problems in practical applications should be rethought profoundly by various rating agencies and administrations in order to build a real scientific and rational evaluation system of academic journals.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Purpose]The existing academic journals' evaluation system is investigated thoroughly in order to explore its development trend.[Methodology]By analyzing the status and problems of academic journals' evaluation system,a scientific and rational evaluation system is built.[Findings]There are tw o kinds of academic journalsv evaluation system in China.One is based on the assessmentof qualified appraisaland excellent journal evaluation.The other is based on the influenceof core journals' evaluation.These tw o evaluation systems both have certain limitations.Rating agencies in China should integrate and cooperate w ith each other,take advocating academic norms as an important responsibility,in order to establish a unified and normative academic journals' evaluation system suitable for China' s situation.And the evaluation parameter system and methods should be improved constantly.In the selection of evaluation parameters,its role of guiding the quality of journals should be paid more attention to.[Conclusions] The problems in practical applications should be rethought profoundly by various rating agencies and administrations in order to build a real scientific and rational evaluation system of academic journals.

Key concepts: Normative, China, Order (exchange), Rational analysis, Rating system, Quality (philosophy), Evaluation methods, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The status and development trend of Chinese academic journals evaluation system — Research Paper | ScholarLens