The status and development trend of Chinese academic journals evaluation system
Ya Li
Abstract
Ya Li
Abstract
[Purpose]The existing academic journals' evaluation system is investigated thoroughly in order to explore its development trend.[Methodology]By analyzing the status and problems of academic journals' evaluation system,a scientific and rational evaluation system is built.[Findings]There are tw o kinds of academic journalsv evaluation system in China.One is based on the assessmentof qualified appraisaland excellent journal evaluation.The other is based on the influenceof core journals' evaluation.These tw o evaluation systems both have certain limitations.Rating agencies in China should integrate and cooperate w ith each other,take advocating academic norms as an important responsibility,in order to establish a unified and normative academic journals' evaluation system suitable for China' s situation.And the evaluation parameter system and methods should be improved constantly.In the selection of evaluation parameters,its role of guiding the quality of journals should be paid more attention to.[Conclusions] The problems in practical applications should be rethought profoundly by various rating agencies and administrations in order to build a real scientific and rational evaluation system of academic journals.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
[Purpose]The existing academic journals' evaluation system is investigated thoroughly in order to explore its development trend.[Methodology]By analyzing the status and problems of academic journals' evaluation system,a scientific and rational evaluation system is built.[Findings]There are tw o kinds of academic journalsv evaluation system in China.One is based on the assessmentof qualified appraisaland excellent journal evaluation.The other is based on the influenceof core journals' evaluation.These tw o evaluation systems both have certain limitations.Rating agencies in China should integrate and cooperate w ith each other,take advocating academic norms as an important responsibility,in order to establish a unified and normative academic journals' evaluation system suitable for China' s situation.And the evaluation parameter system and methods should be improved constantly.In the selection of evaluation parameters,its role of guiding the quality of journals should be paid more attention to.[Conclusions] The problems in practical applications should be rethought profoundly by various rating agencies and administrations in order to build a real scientific and rational evaluation system of academic journals.
Key concepts: Normative, China, Order (exchange), Rational analysis, Rating system, Quality (philosophy), Evaluation methods, Computer science