Experimental study on repair of alveolar cleft using distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor
LI Chi-bin, Sun Yat-sen
Abstract
LI Chi-bin, Sun Yat-sen
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of repairing alveolar cleft with distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor and the effects of micro-implant to anchorage tooth. METHODS: Fourteen adult mongrel dogs were divided into A(tooth-borne, n=6), B(micro-implant and tooth-borne, n=6)and C (the control, n=2) group. Alveolar bone resection was made surgically at first. After 2 weeks, the tooth-born complex transport disc was formed by osteotomy. Micro-implant was implanted into the transport disc in group B. Gradual distraction was started after 1-week latency. The dogs were sacrificed at 1 month after completion of distraction(1 month in control group). The samples were evaluated by clinical examination, histology observation. Date was analyzed for Fisher' exact test and t test with SPSS.10.0 software package. RESULTS: The alveolar bone gap disappeared in group A and B. The masculine number showed that there was significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), and the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone had a significant difference between the two groups(P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor may be used for repair of alveolar cleft. Micro-implant can protect the pulp and periodontal tissues of anchorage tooth, and decrease the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of repairing alveolar cleft with distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor and the effects of micro-implant to anchorage tooth. METHODS: Fourteen adult mongrel dogs were divided into A(tooth-borne, n=6), B(micro-implant and tooth-borne, n=6)and C (the control, n=2) group. Alveolar bone resection was made surgically at first. After 2 weeks, the tooth-born complex transport disc was formed by osteotomy. Micro-implant was implanted into the transport disc in group B. Gradual distraction was started after 1-week latency. The dogs were sacrificed at 1 month after completion of distraction(1 month in control group). The samples were evaluated by clinical examination, histology observation. Date was analyzed for Fisher' exact test and t test with SPSS.10.0 software package. RESULTS: The alveolar bone gap disappeared in group A and B. The masculine number showed that there was significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), and the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone had a significant difference between the two groups(P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor may be used for repair of alveolar cleft. Micro-implant can protect the pulp and periodontal tissues of anchorage tooth, and decrease the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone.
Key concepts: Distraction osteogenesis, Dental alveolus, Dentistry, Implant, Medicine, Distraction, Orthodontics, Dental implant