2008•China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryRequires access

Experimental study on repair of alveolar cleft using distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor

LI Chi-bin, Sun Yat-sen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of repairing alveolar cleft with distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor and the effects of micro-implant to anchorage tooth. METHODS: Fourteen adult mongrel dogs were divided into A(tooth-borne, n=6), B(micro-implant and tooth-borne, n=6)and C (the control, n=2) group. Alveolar bone resection was made surgically at first. After 2 weeks, the tooth-born complex transport disc was formed by osteotomy. Micro-implant was implanted into the transport disc in group B. Gradual distraction was started after 1-week latency. The dogs were sacrificed at 1 month after completion of distraction(1 month in control group). The samples were evaluated by clinical examination, histology observation. Date was analyzed for Fisher' exact test and t test with SPSS.10.0 software package. RESULTS: The alveolar bone gap disappeared in group A and B. The masculine number showed that there was significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), and the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone had a significant difference between the two groups(P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor may be used for repair of alveolar cleft. Micro-implant can protect the pulp and periodontal tissues of anchorage tooth, and decrease the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of repairing alveolar cleft with distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor and the effects of micro-implant to anchorage tooth. METHODS: Fourteen adult mongrel dogs were divided into A(tooth-borne, n=6), B(micro-implant and tooth-borne, n=6)and C (the control, n=2) group. Alveolar bone resection was made surgically at first. After 2 weeks, the tooth-born complex transport disc was formed by osteotomy. Micro-implant was implanted into the transport disc in group B. Gradual distraction was started after 1-week latency. The dogs were sacrificed at 1 month after completion of distraction(1 month in control group). The samples were evaluated by clinical examination, histology observation. Date was analyzed for Fisher' exact test and t test with SPSS.10.0 software package. RESULTS: The alveolar bone gap disappeared in group A and B. The masculine number showed that there was significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), and the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone had a significant difference between the two groups(P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor may be used for repair of alveolar cleft. Micro-implant can protect the pulp and periodontal tissues of anchorage tooth, and decrease the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of repairing alveolar cleft with distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor and the effects of micro-implant to anchorage tooth. METHODS: Fourteen adult mongrel dogs were divided into A(tooth-borne, n=6), B(micro-implant and tooth-borne, n=6)and C (the control, n=2) group. Alveolar bone resection was made surgically at first. After 2 weeks, the tooth-born complex transport disc was formed by osteotomy. Micro-implant was implanted into the transport disc in group B. Gradual distraction was started after 1-week latency. The dogs were sacrificed at 1 month after completion of distraction(1 month in control group). The samples were evaluated by clinical examination, histology observation. Date was analyzed for Fisher' exact test and t test with SPSS.10.0 software package. RESULTS: The alveolar bone gap disappeared in group A and B. The masculine number showed that there was significant difference between the two groups(P0.05), and the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone had a significant difference between the two groups(P0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor may be used for repair of alveolar cleft. Micro-implant can protect the pulp and periodontal tissues of anchorage tooth, and decrease the moving distance of anchorage tooth in bone.

Key concepts: Distraction osteogenesis, Dental alveolus, Dentistry, Implant, Medicine, Distraction, Orthodontics, Dental implant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental study on repair of alveolar cleft using distraction osteogenesis by micro-implant and tooth-borne intraoral distractor — Research Paper | ScholarLens