2003The Orthopedic Journal of ChinaRequires access

Preliminary Study on Accessory Nerve Transfer for Reanimating the Diaphragm in Rats with High Cervical Spinal Cord Transversal Injury

LI Jia-shun

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective:To explore the effect of accessory nerve transfer to phrenic nerve for reanimating the diaphragm in rats with high cervical spine transversal injury.Method:One hundred rats were divided into A and B groups.Expose and transected bilateral phrenic nerve at C 6 level by the cervical anterior approach.The phrenic nerve of A group rats were directly anastomosed.The accessory nerve of B group rats are exposed,transected and transfered to phrenic nerve when its stern joined into trapezius.After observed the diaphragm action the cervical spinal cord was transversal transected at C 3?4level.Record the diaphragm's translation again then compared the motor function reinstatement between A and B groups before operation and after operation 5 min,1,2,4,6,8 months.Result:Before high cervical cord injury no statistical significant differences were found about diaphragm motion recovery.After high cervical spinal cord was injured there were significant differences comparing the accessory nerve to phrenic nerve transfer for reinstatement of diaphragm's motor function with phrenic nerve direct anastomosed.Conclusion:The accessory nerve transfer to phrenic nerve is an effective means of reanimating the diaphragm in rats with high cervical spinal cord transversal injury.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To explore the effect of accessory nerve transfer to phrenic nerve for reanimating the diaphragm in rats with high cervical spine transversal injury.Method:One hundred rats were divided into A and B groups.Expose and transected bilateral phrenic nerve at C 6 level by the cervical anterior approach.The phrenic nerve of A group rats were directly anastomosed.The accessory nerve of B group rats are exposed,transected and transfered to phrenic nerve when its stern joined into trapezius.After observed the diaphragm action the cervical spinal cord was transversal transected at C 3?4level.Record the diaphragm's translation again then compared the motor function reinstatement between A and B groups before operation and after operation 5 min,1,2,4,6,8 months.Result:Before high cervical cord injury no statistical significant differences were found about diaphragm motion recovery.After high cervical spinal cord was injured there were significant differences comparing the accessory nerve to phrenic nerve transfer for reinstatement of diaphragm's motor function with phrenic nerve direct anastomosed.Conclusion:The accessory nerve transfer to phrenic nerve is an effective means of reanimating the diaphragm in rats with high cervical spinal cord transversal injury.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To explore the effect of accessory nerve transfer to phrenic nerve for reanimating the diaphragm in rats with high cervical spine transversal injury.Method:One hundred rats were divided into A and B groups.Expose and transected bilateral phrenic nerve at C 6 level by the cervical anterior approach.The phrenic nerve of A group rats were directly anastomosed.The accessory nerve of B group rats are exposed,transected and transfered to phrenic nerve when its stern joined into trapezius.After observed the diaphragm action the cervical spinal cord was transversal transected at C 3?4level.Record the diaphragm's translation again then compared the motor function reinstatement between A and B groups before operation and after operation 5 min,1,2,4,6,8 months.Result:Before high cervical cord injury no statistical significant differences were found about diaphragm motion recovery.After high cervical spinal cord was injured there were significant differences comparing the accessory nerve to phrenic nerve transfer for reinstatement of diaphragm's motor function with phrenic nerve direct anastomosed.Conclusion:The accessory nerve transfer to phrenic nerve is an effective means of reanimating the diaphragm in rats with high cervical spinal cord transversal injury.

Key concepts: Medicine, Phrenic nerve, Diaphragm (acoustics), Accessory nerve, Spinal cord, Spinal cord injury, Anatomy, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preliminary Study on Accessory Nerve Transfer for Reanimating the Diaphragm in Rats with High Cervical Spinal Cord Transversal Injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens