ScholarLens Back to search
2008•Modern hospitalRequires access

THE DIFFERENCE OF INTUBATION EFFECTS BETWEEN LARYNGEAL MASK AND ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE ON GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Liu Ming-ji

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the difference of intubation effects between laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube on general anesthesia.Methods Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups:group A used endotracheal tube for intubation after induction while group B received laryngeal mask. Hemodynamic index, successful intubation ratio at one attempt and side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation were compared in two groups.Results The differences in blood pressure, the first successful intubation ratio, side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation between the two groups indicated that those of group B were much better than those in group A,(p0.05). Conclusion Laryngeal mask could maintain more stable hemodynamic index, obviously improve the successful intubation radio at one attempt and decrease side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the difference of intubation effects between laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube on general anesthesia.Methods Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups:group A used endotracheal tube for intubation after induction while group B received laryngeal mask. Hemodynamic index, successful intubation ratio at one attempt and side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation were compared in two groups.Results The differences in blood pressure, the first successful intubation ratio, side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation between the two groups indicated that those of group B were much better than those in group A,(p0.05). Conclusion Laryngeal mask could maintain more stable hemodynamic index, obviously improve the successful intubation radio at one attempt and decrease side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the difference of intubation effects between laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube on general anesthesia.Methods Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups:group A used endotracheal tube for intubation after induction while group B received laryngeal mask. Hemodynamic index, successful intubation ratio at one attempt and side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation were compared in two groups.Results The differences in blood pressure, the first successful intubation ratio, side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation between the two groups indicated that those of group B were much better than those in group A,(p0.05). Conclusion Laryngeal mask could maintain more stable hemodynamic index, obviously improve the successful intubation radio at one attempt and decrease side effects of nausea, vomiting and pharyngeal stimulation.

Key concepts: Nausea, Vomiting, Anesthesia, Intubation, Medicine, Endotracheal intubation, Endotracheal tube, Hemodynamics

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE DIFFERENCE OF INTUBATION EFFECTS BETWEEN LARYNGEAL MASK AND ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE ON GENERAL ANESTHESIA — Research Paper | ScholarLens