2013•Zhongguo quanke yixueRequires access

Randomized Control Trial of Gabapentin and Carbamazepine in the Treatment of Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Zhen Wang

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the efficacy and safety of Gabapentin and Carbamazepine in treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia(RTN).Methods Fifty RTN patients were divided randomly into groups C(taking Carbamzepine) and G(taking Gabapentin),25 in each.Visual analog scale(VAS) was used to analyze pain relief before treatment and after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment,drug dosage,and life satisfaction index B(LSI-B) used to evaluate patients' life satisfaction,and efficacy,adverse events observed.Results A total of 48 patients finished this study,thereinto 23 in group C,25 in group G.The average drug dosage was(1 884 ± 546) mg / d in group G,(652 ± 121) mg / d in group C,the difference was significant(P 0.01).There was difference in VAS at different time before and after treatment(P 0.01);VAS after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment decreased as compared with that of pre-treatment(P 0.01).There was no difference in VAS between the two groups before treatment and after 2,4 weeks of treatment(P 0.05).LSI-B after 4 weeks of treatment was higher than that before treatment in 2 groups(P 0.05),and that of group G higher than that of group C(P 0.01).There was no difference in efficacy between 2 groups after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment(P 0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions of group G was 28.0%(7 /25),lower than that of group C 〔56.5%(13 /23) 〕,the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusion Gabapentin and Carbamazepine are effective and safe in treatment of RTN,but Gabapentin is superior to Carbamazepine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the efficacy and safety of Gabapentin and Carbamazepine in treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia(RTN).Methods Fifty RTN patients were divided randomly into groups C(taking Carbamzepine) and G(taking Gabapentin),25 in each.Visual analog scale(VAS) was used to analyze pain relief before treatment and after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment,drug dosage,and life satisfaction index B(LSI-B) used to evaluate patients' life satisfaction,and efficacy,adverse events observed.Results A total of 48 patients finished this study,thereinto 23 in group C,25 in group G.The average drug dosage was(1 884 ± 546) mg / d in group G,(652 ± 121) mg / d in group C,the difference was significant(P 0.01).There was difference in VAS at different time before and after treatment(P 0.01);VAS after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment decreased as compared with that of pre-treatment(P 0.01).There was no difference in VAS between the two groups before treatment and after 2,4 weeks of treatment(P 0.05).LSI-B after 4 weeks of treatment was higher than that before treatment in 2 groups(P 0.05),and that of group G higher than that of group C(P 0.01).There was no difference in efficacy between 2 groups after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment(P 0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions of group G was 28.0%(7 /25),lower than that of group C 〔56.5%(13 /23) 〕,the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusion Gabapentin and Carbamazepine are effective and safe in treatment of RTN,but Gabapentin is superior to Carbamazepine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the efficacy and safety of Gabapentin and Carbamazepine in treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia(RTN).Methods Fifty RTN patients were divided randomly into groups C(taking Carbamzepine) and G(taking Gabapentin),25 in each.Visual analog scale(VAS) was used to analyze pain relief before treatment and after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment,drug dosage,and life satisfaction index B(LSI-B) used to evaluate patients' life satisfaction,and efficacy,adverse events observed.Results A total of 48 patients finished this study,thereinto 23 in group C,25 in group G.The average drug dosage was(1 884 ± 546) mg / d in group G,(652 ± 121) mg / d in group C,the difference was significant(P 0.01).There was difference in VAS at different time before and after treatment(P 0.01);VAS after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment decreased as compared with that of pre-treatment(P 0.01).There was no difference in VAS between the two groups before treatment and after 2,4 weeks of treatment(P 0.05).LSI-B after 4 weeks of treatment was higher than that before treatment in 2 groups(P 0.05),and that of group G higher than that of group C(P 0.01).There was no difference in efficacy between 2 groups after 1,2,4 weeks of treatment(P 0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions of group G was 28.0%(7 /25),lower than that of group C 〔56.5%(13 /23) 〕,the difference was significant(P 0.05).Conclusion Gabapentin and Carbamazepine are effective and safe in treatment of RTN,but Gabapentin is superior to Carbamazepine.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gabapentin, Trigeminal neuralgia, Carbamazepine, Visual analogue scale, Anesthesia, Adverse effect, Neuralgia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Randomized Control Trial of Gabapentin and Carbamazepine in the Treatment of Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia — Research Paper | ScholarLens