2005•Caijing lilun yu shijianRequires access

Formal Institutional Arrangement of Property Rights Reform in Russia and Its Implication

Chuang Yuan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The application of new institutional economics theories in the analysis of the institutional arrangement of property rights reform shows that it is the institution itself leading to unfairness, inefficiency and dignitary-benefited privatization in Russia. The lesson told us that it is necessary for China to avoid such an institutional trap in its property rights reform, and that owners arrangement of state-owned property rights is the key of the institution and the institution construction of state-owned enterprise property rights reform should be brought into stringent criterion of law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The application of new institutional economics theories in the analysis of the institutional arrangement of property rights reform shows that it is the institution itself leading to unfairness, inefficiency and dignitary-benefited privatization in Russia. The lesson told us that it is necessary for China to avoid such an institutional trap in its property rights reform, and that owners arrangement of state-owned property rights is the key of the institution and the institution construction of state-owned enterprise property rights reform should be brought into stringent criterion of law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The application of new institutional economics theories in the analysis of the institutional arrangement of property rights reform shows that it is the institution itself leading to unfairness, inefficiency and dignitary-benefited privatization in Russia. The lesson told us that it is necessary for China to avoid such an institutional trap in its property rights reform, and that owners arrangement of state-owned property rights is the key of the institution and the institution construction of state-owned enterprise property rights reform should be brought into stringent criterion of law.

Key concepts: Property rights, Inefficiency, Institution, China, State (computer science), Law and economics, Property (philosophy), Property law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Formal Institutional Arrangement of Property Rights Reform in Russia and Its Implication — Research Paper | ScholarLens