2010Fujian yiyao zazhiRequires access

Scanning electron microscopic study on the use of different kinds of irrigants in ultrasonic root canal instrumentation

Chen Chan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the cleaning ability of different kinds of irrigants used as ultrasonic root canal irrigant.Methods Twenty-four with single-canal were randomly divided into three groups.All root canals were prepared with crown-down technique.Each group of specimens received a final irrigation with ultrasound for one minute:Group A,2% chlorhexidine solution(CHX);Group B,2.5%sodium hypochlorite solution(NaClO);Group C,distilled water.The teeth were split along buccolingual direction,the presence of debris and smear layer in the cervical,middle and apical third of the root canals were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope.The data were analyzed statistically by One-way ANOVA.Results Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference among the three groups for debris removal(P0.05),but there was significant difference among the three groups for smear layer removal(P0.05).Both Group A and B had significantly less smear layer and more visible open dentinal tubules compared with group C(P0.05).The difference of smear layer between group A and B was statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Ultrasonic irrigation is one of effective techniques for debris removal.Both 2.5%NaClO and 2% CHX can remove the smear layer.The cleaning ability of 2.5% NaClO to smear layer is better than 2% chlorhexidine solution as an ultrasonic irrigant of root canals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the cleaning ability of different kinds of irrigants used as ultrasonic root canal irrigant.Methods Twenty-four with single-canal were randomly divided into three groups.All root canals were prepared with crown-down technique.Each group of specimens received a final irrigation with ultrasound for one minute:Group A,2% chlorhexidine solution(CHX);Group B,2.5%sodium hypochlorite solution(NaClO);Group C,distilled water.The teeth were split along buccolingual direction,the presence of debris and smear layer in the cervical,middle and apical third of the root canals were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope.The data were analyzed statistically by One-way ANOVA.Results Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference among the three groups for debris removal(P0.05),but there was significant difference among the three groups for smear layer removal(P0.05).Both Group A and B had significantly less smear layer and more visible open dentinal tubules compared with group C(P0.05).The difference of smear layer between group A and B was statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Ultrasonic irrigation is one of effective techniques for debris removal.Both 2.5%NaClO and 2% CHX can remove the smear layer.The cleaning ability of 2.5% NaClO to smear layer is better than 2% chlorhexidine solution as an ultrasonic irrigant of root canals.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the cleaning ability of different kinds of irrigants used as ultrasonic root canal irrigant.Methods Twenty-four with single-canal were randomly divided into three groups.All root canals were prepared with crown-down technique.Each group of specimens received a final irrigation with ultrasound for one minute:Group A,2% chlorhexidine solution(CHX);Group B,2.5%sodium hypochlorite solution(NaClO);Group C,distilled water.The teeth were split along buccolingual direction,the presence of debris and smear layer in the cervical,middle and apical third of the root canals were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope.The data were analyzed statistically by One-way ANOVA.Results Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference among the three groups for debris removal(P0.05),but there was significant difference among the three groups for smear layer removal(P0.05).Both Group A and B had significantly less smear layer and more visible open dentinal tubules compared with group C(P0.05).The difference of smear layer between group A and B was statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Ultrasonic irrigation is one of effective techniques for debris removal.Both 2.5%NaClO and 2% CHX can remove the smear layer.The cleaning ability of 2.5% NaClO to smear layer is better than 2% chlorhexidine solution as an ultrasonic irrigant of root canals.

Key concepts: Smear layer, Sodium hypochlorite, Dentistry, Root canal, Chlorhexidine, Distilled water, Dentinal Tubule, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Scanning electron microscopic study on the use of different kinds of irrigants in ultrasonic root canal instrumentation — Research Paper | ScholarLens