Application Modes of Different Root Canal Irrigants in Removing Smear Layer of Root Canals:A Comparative Study
Hailiang Wang
Abstract
Hailiang Wang
Abstract
Objective To compare the effects of application modes of different root canal irrigants on removing the smear layer of root canals.Methods 40 human teeth with a single root canal were randomly divided into 5 groups after the amputation of the crowns of these teeth.All of the root canals were irrigated with six different root canal irrigants when the canals were prepared with crown-down technique.The teeth in Group A were irrigated with 20 g/L chlorhexidine acetate solution (CHX),and Group B with 25 g/L sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl).In the specimens of Group C the root canals were irrigated with 20 g/L CHX + EDTA gel,and those of Group D with 25 g/L NaOCl+EDTA gel.The control specimens in Group E were irrigated with distilled water.After the teeth were split into two buccal-lingually,the cleaning effects of all the specimens from the 5 groups on the removal of smear layer in the middle third of the root canal and debris was observed with a scanning electron microscope,and analyzed statistically.Results Compared with Group E,there was significant difference among Group A,B,C and D (P0.05).Group B and D had significantly less smear layer and more visible open dentinal tubules compared with Group A and C(P0.05).Paired comparison showed that Group C was superior to Group A (P0.05).There was no significant difference between Group B and D (P0.05).Conclusion Either chlorhexidine or NaOCl,used alone or in combination with EDTA gel,can remove smear layer.The group with NaOCl+ EDTA gel has the best cleaning effect.Chlorhexidine solution as a root canal irrigant cannot remove all the smear layer from the root-canal system.Combined with EDTA gel,however,its performance in the removal of smear layer has obviously improved.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the effects of application modes of different root canal irrigants on removing the smear layer of root canals.Methods 40 human teeth with a single root canal were randomly divided into 5 groups after the amputation of the crowns of these teeth.All of the root canals were irrigated with six different root canal irrigants when the canals were prepared with crown-down technique.The teeth in Group A were irrigated with 20 g/L chlorhexidine acetate solution (CHX),and Group B with 25 g/L sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl).In the specimens of Group C the root canals were irrigated with 20 g/L CHX + EDTA gel,and those of Group D with 25 g/L NaOCl+EDTA gel.The control specimens in Group E were irrigated with distilled water.After the teeth were split into two buccal-lingually,the cleaning effects of all the specimens from the 5 groups on the removal of smear layer in the middle third of the root canal and debris was observed with a scanning electron microscope,and analyzed statistically.Results Compared with Group E,there was significant difference among Group A,B,C and D (P0.05).Group B and D had significantly less smear layer and more visible open dentinal tubules compared with Group A and C(P0.05).Paired comparison showed that Group C was superior to Group A (P0.05).There was no significant difference between Group B and D (P0.05).Conclusion Either chlorhexidine or NaOCl,used alone or in combination with EDTA gel,can remove smear layer.The group with NaOCl+ EDTA gel has the best cleaning effect.Chlorhexidine solution as a root canal irrigant cannot remove all the smear layer from the root-canal system.Combined with EDTA gel,however,its performance in the removal of smear layer has obviously improved.
Key concepts: Smear layer, Sodium hypochlorite, Dentistry, Root canal, Chlorhexidine, Dentinal Tubule, Crown (dentistry), Distilled water