2005Journal of SwuplRequires access

Procedural Validity of a Death Penalty

HU Zhi-fang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The requirement of the procedural validity of a death penalty is harsher than that of other criminal sanctions. So a more rigorous procedure is required to impose a death sentence and the condemned criminal is given more rights to plead. In view of the trial procedure, access to justice and standards of proof, the Civil Rights and Political Rights International Convention and the Measures for Protection of the Rights of Prisoners Condemned to the Death Penalty have prescribed the minimum standards of procedural validity of a death penalty. In reference to the standards and in respect of China’s legislations relevant to the death penalty and existing judicial system, some reform should be effected to separate the procedure into conviction and sentence. The judicial review and execution procedures should also be improved. Further, we should distinguish the criteria to prove whether it is a death crime and reinforce the protection of the rights of a condemned criminal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The requirement of the procedural validity of a death penalty is harsher than that of other criminal sanctions. So a more rigorous procedure is required to impose a death sentence and the condemned criminal is given more rights to plead. In view of the trial procedure, access to justice and standards of proof, the Civil Rights and Political Rights International Convention and the Measures for Protection of the Rights of Prisoners Condemned to the Death Penalty have prescribed the minimum standards of procedural validity of a death penalty. In reference to the standards and in respect of China’s legislations relevant to the death penalty and existing judicial system, some reform should be effected to separate the procedure into conviction and sentence. The judicial review and execution procedures should also be improved. Further, we should distinguish the criteria to prove whether it is a death crime and reinforce the protection of the rights of a condemned criminal.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The requirement of the procedural validity of a death penalty is harsher than that of other criminal sanctions. So a more rigorous procedure is required to impose a death sentence and the condemned criminal is given more rights to plead. In view of the trial procedure, access to justice and standards of proof, the Civil Rights and Political Rights International Convention and the Measures for Protection of the Rights of Prisoners Condemned to the Death Penalty have prescribed the minimum standards of procedural validity of a death penalty. In reference to the standards and in respect of China’s legislations relevant to the death penalty and existing judicial system, some reform should be effected to separate the procedure into conviction and sentence. The judicial review and execution procedures should also be improved. Further, we should distinguish the criteria to prove whether it is a death crime and reinforce the protection of the rights of a condemned criminal.

Key concepts: Law, Sanctions, Conviction, Political science, Sentence, Criminal procedure, Politics, Convention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Procedural Validity of a Death Penalty — Research Paper | ScholarLens