2010Laboratory Medicine and ClinicRequires access

Clinical analysis of three kinds of syphilis serological test methods

Zhou Wei-gan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore common three syphilis serologic test methods,so to select the most appropriate screening method of syphilis. Methods The syphilis serological screening of the clinic patients was conducted lay means of most commonly rapid plasma reagin (RPR),syphilis antibody specificity enzyme-linked immunosorbent test (TP-ELISA) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) three methods for hospital,which are very popular in the clinical laboratory for syphilis test. Results By the three kinds of test methods,there was no significant differences in TP-ELISA and TPPA method detection result compared with the one of RPR is of great significant difference (P 0.01). Conclusion The laboratory shall reasonably select three different methods for syphilis,which will help to reduce the misdiagnosis rate of syphilis,and provide a reference basis for the identification of the development of syphilis in clinic,moreover,it is of great significance in the judgement of syphilis installment,healing and drug efficacy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore common three syphilis serologic test methods,so to select the most appropriate screening method of syphilis. Methods The syphilis serological screening of the clinic patients was conducted lay means of most commonly rapid plasma reagin (RPR),syphilis antibody specificity enzyme-linked immunosorbent test (TP-ELISA) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) three methods for hospital,which are very popular in the clinical laboratory for syphilis test. Results By the three kinds of test methods,there was no significant differences in TP-ELISA and TPPA method detection result compared with the one of RPR is of great significant difference (P 0.01). Conclusion The laboratory shall reasonably select three different methods for syphilis,which will help to reduce the misdiagnosis rate of syphilis,and provide a reference basis for the identification of the development of syphilis in clinic,moreover,it is of great significance in the judgement of syphilis installment,healing and drug efficacy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore common three syphilis serologic test methods,so to select the most appropriate screening method of syphilis. Methods The syphilis serological screening of the clinic patients was conducted lay means of most commonly rapid plasma reagin (RPR),syphilis antibody specificity enzyme-linked immunosorbent test (TP-ELISA) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) three methods for hospital,which are very popular in the clinical laboratory for syphilis test. Results By the three kinds of test methods,there was no significant differences in TP-ELISA and TPPA method detection result compared with the one of RPR is of great significant difference (P 0.01). Conclusion The laboratory shall reasonably select three different methods for syphilis,which will help to reduce the misdiagnosis rate of syphilis,and provide a reference basis for the identification of the development of syphilis in clinic,moreover,it is of great significance in the judgement of syphilis installment,healing and drug efficacy.

Key concepts: Syphilis, Rapid plasma reagin, Medicine, Serology, Treponema, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Immunology, Antibody

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical analysis of three kinds of syphilis serological test methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens