2006Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Comparative study of mirtazapine vs clomipramine in treatment of dysthymic disorder

Changhong Wang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of mirtazapine vs clomipramine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder. METHODS: Seventy (34 patients treated with clomipramine; 36 patients with mirtazapine) patients of dysthymic disorder were randomly assigned to two groups. One group was treated with mirtazapine and the other with clomipramine for a course of 6 wk to assess their clinical efficacy and adverse reactions, including dosages of mirtazapine and clomipramine, 45 mg·d~(-1) and 200 mg·d~(-1), respectively. RESULTS: At the end of wk 1 of the treatment, HAMD(Hamilton rating scale) showed that the clinical efficacy of mirtazapine group was better than that of clomipramine group (P 0.01), there was no significant difference in clinical effects between two groups by Ridit analysis (P 0.05) ,and the adverse reactions of mirtazapine group were less and milder. CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of dysthymic disorder.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of mirtazapine vs clomipramine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder. METHODS: Seventy (34 patients treated with clomipramine; 36 patients with mirtazapine) patients of dysthymic disorder were randomly assigned to two groups. One group was treated with mirtazapine and the other with clomipramine for a course of 6 wk to assess their clinical efficacy and adverse reactions, including dosages of mirtazapine and clomipramine, 45 mg·d~(-1) and 200 mg·d~(-1), respectively. RESULTS: At the end of wk 1 of the treatment, HAMD(Hamilton rating scale) showed that the clinical efficacy of mirtazapine group was better than that of clomipramine group (P 0.01), there was no significant difference in clinical effects between two groups by Ridit analysis (P 0.05) ,and the adverse reactions of mirtazapine group were less and milder. CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of dysthymic disorder.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of mirtazapine vs clomipramine in the treatment of dysthymic disorder. METHODS: Seventy (34 patients treated with clomipramine; 36 patients with mirtazapine) patients of dysthymic disorder were randomly assigned to two groups. One group was treated with mirtazapine and the other with clomipramine for a course of 6 wk to assess their clinical efficacy and adverse reactions, including dosages of mirtazapine and clomipramine, 45 mg·d~(-1) and 200 mg·d~(-1), respectively. RESULTS: At the end of wk 1 of the treatment, HAMD(Hamilton rating scale) showed that the clinical efficacy of mirtazapine group was better than that of clomipramine group (P 0.01), there was no significant difference in clinical effects between two groups by Ridit analysis (P 0.05) ,and the adverse reactions of mirtazapine group were less and milder. CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of dysthymic disorder.

Key concepts: Mirtazapine, Clomipramine, Hamd, Dysthymic Disorder, Adverse effect, Medicine, Internal medicine, Dose

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of mirtazapine vs clomipramine in treatment of dysthymic disorder — Research Paper | ScholarLens