2006Chinese Journal of School HealthRequires access

Comparison of Two Obesity Criteria Among Primary and Secondary School Students in Jing'an District in Shanghai

Zhou Zu-hua

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the results of obesity status by using weight-forheight standard method and the Body Mass Index(BMI) Reference Norm for Screening Overweight and Obesity in Chinese Children and Adolescents made by WGOC in 2003.Methods Using weight-for-height standard method and reference standard of BMI made by WGOC,a cross-sectional assessment of obesity and overweight was carried out in monitoring school students(aged 7-18) in Jing'an District,Shanghai.Two groups of obesity students' characteristics were compared with each other.Results 1) By using weight-for-height method and BMI,the prevalence rates of obesity were 16.44% and 10.51% and the prevalence rates of overweight were 12.90% and 15.31%.2) The prevalence rates of obesity and overweight were significantly different using the two methods.There were 4.41%(734/16 640)of the students unable to be screened using weight-for-height method and 91.69%(673/734) were boys aged 13-17.3)There were more obesity students in primary schools than in middle schools,and more obesity students in boys than in girls with two both criteria.Conclusion Weight-for-height standard in 1985 can not correctly reflect the status of obesity and overweight in children and adolescents,and BMI criteria made by WGOC in 2003 is a more scientific method in screening normal,overweight and obesity students.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the results of obesity status by using weight-forheight standard method and the Body Mass Index(BMI) Reference Norm for Screening Overweight and Obesity in Chinese Children and Adolescents made by WGOC in 2003.Methods Using weight-for-height standard method and reference standard of BMI made by WGOC,a cross-sectional assessment of obesity and overweight was carried out in monitoring school students(aged 7-18) in Jing'an District,Shanghai.Two groups of obesity students' characteristics were compared with each other.Results 1) By using weight-for-height method and BMI,the prevalence rates of obesity were 16.44% and 10.51% and the prevalence rates of overweight were 12.90% and 15.31%.2) The prevalence rates of obesity and overweight were significantly different using the two methods.There were 4.41%(734/16 640)of the students unable to be screened using weight-for-height method and 91.69%(673/734) were boys aged 13-17.3)There were more obesity students in primary schools than in middle schools,and more obesity students in boys than in girls with two both criteria.Conclusion Weight-for-height standard in 1985 can not correctly reflect the status of obesity and overweight in children and adolescents,and BMI criteria made by WGOC in 2003 is a more scientific method in screening normal,overweight and obesity students.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the results of obesity status by using weight-forheight standard method and the Body Mass Index(BMI) Reference Norm for Screening Overweight and Obesity in Chinese Children and Adolescents made by WGOC in 2003.Methods Using weight-for-height standard method and reference standard of BMI made by WGOC,a cross-sectional assessment of obesity and overweight was carried out in monitoring school students(aged 7-18) in Jing'an District,Shanghai.Two groups of obesity students' characteristics were compared with each other.Results 1) By using weight-for-height method and BMI,the prevalence rates of obesity were 16.44% and 10.51% and the prevalence rates of overweight were 12.90% and 15.31%.2) The prevalence rates of obesity and overweight were significantly different using the two methods.There were 4.41%(734/16 640)of the students unable to be screened using weight-for-height method and 91.69%(673/734) were boys aged 13-17.3)There were more obesity students in primary schools than in middle schools,and more obesity students in boys than in girls with two both criteria.Conclusion Weight-for-height standard in 1985 can not correctly reflect the status of obesity and overweight in children and adolescents,and BMI criteria made by WGOC in 2003 is a more scientific method in screening normal,overweight and obesity students.

Key concepts: Overweight, Obesity, Medicine, Body mass index, Pediatrics, Normal weight, Demography, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Two Obesity Criteria Among Primary and Secondary School Students in Jing'an District in Shanghai — Research Paper | ScholarLens