2006Zhonghua jianyan yixue zazhiRequires access

The comparative study and the bias estimation on the result of serum enzymes with different biochemical detecting system

Liang Wei-xion

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective The comparability of serum enzyme results of different biochemical detecting system were studied through bias estimation and method comparison. Method Following NCCLS document EP9-A2, different biochemical detecting system, detecting system 1-4(laboratory method) and detecting system 5 (comparison method, which includes Hitachi 7170 biochemical analyzer, reagent of Roche, C.f.a.s. calibrator and controller of Roche, and have accredited by ISO/IEC 17025), were used respectively to 5 serum enzyme items including ALT, AST, ALP, LDH and CK to obtain the correlation coefficient and the linear equation. Then the coefficient and the equation were used to evaluate the system bias between laboratory method and comparison method. We judge the comparability of different investigate systems according to the half of CLIA′88 standard. Results The system bias of ALT(system 4), ALP at higher value (system 1), AST(systems 3 and 4) were not acceptable, the rest could be accepted. ConclusionIf the same test are determined by more than two systems, it is necessary to do method comparison and Bias estimation for judge clinical acceptability in order to insure the comparability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective The comparability of serum enzyme results of different biochemical detecting system were studied through bias estimation and method comparison. Method Following NCCLS document EP9-A2, different biochemical detecting system, detecting system 1-4(laboratory method) and detecting system 5 (comparison method, which includes Hitachi 7170 biochemical analyzer, reagent of Roche, C.f.a.s. calibrator and controller of Roche, and have accredited by ISO/IEC 17025), were used respectively to 5 serum enzyme items including ALT, AST, ALP, LDH and CK to obtain the correlation coefficient and the linear equation. Then the coefficient and the equation were used to evaluate the system bias between laboratory method and comparison method. We judge the comparability of different investigate systems according to the half of CLIA′88 standard. Results The system bias of ALT(system 4), ALP at higher value (system 1), AST(systems 3 and 4) were not acceptable, the rest could be accepted. ConclusionIf the same test are determined by more than two systems, it is necessary to do method comparison and Bias estimation for judge clinical acceptability in order to insure the comparability.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective The comparability of serum enzyme results of different biochemical detecting system were studied through bias estimation and method comparison. Method Following NCCLS document EP9-A2, different biochemical detecting system, detecting system 1-4(laboratory method) and detecting system 5 (comparison method, which includes Hitachi 7170 biochemical analyzer, reagent of Roche, C.f.a.s. calibrator and controller of Roche, and have accredited by ISO/IEC 17025), were used respectively to 5 serum enzyme items including ALT, AST, ALP, LDH and CK to obtain the correlation coefficient and the linear equation. Then the coefficient and the equation were used to evaluate the system bias between laboratory method and comparison method. We judge the comparability of different investigate systems according to the half of CLIA′88 standard. Results The system bias of ALT(system 4), ALP at higher value (system 1), AST(systems 3 and 4) were not acceptable, the rest could be accepted. ConclusionIf the same test are determined by more than two systems, it is necessary to do method comparison and Bias estimation for judge clinical acceptability in order to insure the comparability.

Key concepts: Comparability, Mathematics, Spectrum analyzer, Statistics, Chromatography, Computer science, Chemistry, Telecommunications

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The comparative study and the bias estimation on the result of serum enzymes with different biochemical detecting system — Research Paper | ScholarLens