2009Laboratory Medicine and ClinicRequires access

Effect of different anticoagulant on red cell osmotic fragility test

Ji Zhang

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of anticoagulative blood samples with EDTA-K2,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin on red cell osmotic fragility test result.Methods 40 EDTA-K2,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin treated blood samples were tested for red cell osmotic fragility.The rest of blood was confected into 50% red cell suspensions after three times washing-up by 0.9% saline for red cell osmotic fragility test.At the same time,the blood samples for controlled trials were free from anticoagulant.Results The red cell osmotic fragility of EDTA-K2 treated blood was obviously higher than the controlled trials,even after washing-up.To some extent,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin treated blood could affect the results.However,it showed there was no significant difference compared with the control group after washing-up.Conclusion Sodium citrate treated and lithium-heparin treated blood samples can be used for red cell osmotic fragility test after washing-up by saline but not EDTA-K2 treated blood.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the effect of anticoagulative blood samples with EDTA-K2,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin on red cell osmotic fragility test result.Methods 40 EDTA-K2,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin treated blood samples were tested for red cell osmotic fragility.The rest of blood was confected into 50% red cell suspensions after three times washing-up by 0.9% saline for red cell osmotic fragility test.At the same time,the blood samples for controlled trials were free from anticoagulant.Results The red cell osmotic fragility of EDTA-K2 treated blood was obviously higher than the controlled trials,even after washing-up.To some extent,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin treated blood could affect the results.However,it showed there was no significant difference compared with the control group after washing-up.Conclusion Sodium citrate treated and lithium-heparin treated blood samples can be used for red cell osmotic fragility test after washing-up by saline but not EDTA-K2 treated blood.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of anticoagulative blood samples with EDTA-K2,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin on red cell osmotic fragility test result.Methods 40 EDTA-K2,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin treated blood samples were tested for red cell osmotic fragility.The rest of blood was confected into 50% red cell suspensions after three times washing-up by 0.9% saline for red cell osmotic fragility test.At the same time,the blood samples for controlled trials were free from anticoagulant.Results The red cell osmotic fragility of EDTA-K2 treated blood was obviously higher than the controlled trials,even after washing-up.To some extent,sodium citrate and lithium-heparin treated blood could affect the results.However,it showed there was no significant difference compared with the control group after washing-up.Conclusion Sodium citrate treated and lithium-heparin treated blood samples can be used for red cell osmotic fragility test after washing-up by saline but not EDTA-K2 treated blood.

Key concepts: Erythrocyte fragility, Sodium citrate, Heparin, Saline, Sodium, Red blood cell, Anticoagulant, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of different anticoagulant on red cell osmotic fragility test — Research Paper | ScholarLens