Comparative study on propafenone and sotalol in paroxysmal rapid atrial fibrillation in non-rheumatic patient
Dao-Qi Zhou
Abstract
Dao-Qi Zhou
Abstract
Objective To evaluate effects of propafenone and sotalol in paroxysmal rapid fibrillation in non-rheumatic patients. Methods Sixty patients with rapid atrial fibrillation between 0. 5 and 72 hours were randomly divided into two groups, treated with intravenous propafenone 70-210 mg and sotalol 1. 5 mg/kg respectively. Rhythms and heart rate were monitered. Results The effective rate of cardioversion for rapid atrial fibrillation was significantly highter in propafenone group (78. 1%)than in sotalol group (39. 3%)(P0. 05). The heart rate in the patients without cardioversion was decreased more in sotalol group(36%) than that in propafenone group (5. 2%)(P0. 05). While the mean time responding to the bolus was (46. 5 ± 38. 2) and (23. 9 ± 11. 5) minutes. Conclusion Propafenone is more effective than sotalol in reverting rapid atrial fibrillation. However,sotalol is more effective than propafenone in controlling rapid atrial fibrillation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate effects of propafenone and sotalol in paroxysmal rapid fibrillation in non-rheumatic patients. Methods Sixty patients with rapid atrial fibrillation between 0. 5 and 72 hours were randomly divided into two groups, treated with intravenous propafenone 70-210 mg and sotalol 1. 5 mg/kg respectively. Rhythms and heart rate were monitered. Results The effective rate of cardioversion for rapid atrial fibrillation was significantly highter in propafenone group (78. 1%)than in sotalol group (39. 3%)(P0. 05). The heart rate in the patients without cardioversion was decreased more in sotalol group(36%) than that in propafenone group (5. 2%)(P0. 05). While the mean time responding to the bolus was (46. 5 ± 38. 2) and (23. 9 ± 11. 5) minutes. Conclusion Propafenone is more effective than sotalol in reverting rapid atrial fibrillation. However,sotalol is more effective than propafenone in controlling rapid atrial fibrillation.
Key concepts: Propafenone, Sotalol, Medicine, Atrial fibrillation, Cardiology, Cardioversion, Internal medicine, Bolus (digestion)