2010Shiyong kouqiang yixue zazhiRequires access

A comparison of preliminary bond strength between oxide ceramics and three resin luting cements

Gao Pin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the shear bond strength between oxide ceramics and three resin cements.Methods:Blocks of zirconium dioxide and aluminium sesquioxide ceramics were treated with sandblasting and bonded with three luting cements respectively.After preserved in 37 ℃ water for 24 h,the shear bond strengths of these specimens were tested and the data were analyzed by SAS9.12 software package.Results:There were significant differences among alumina ceramics which manifested that shear bond strength of Superbond C﹠B was the highest(37.60±2.06)MPa.However,in zirconium dioxide groups,RelyXTM Unicem showed the lowest bond strength(13.29±3.05)MPa,but there was no difference between Superbond C﹠B and PanaviaTM F.Conclusion:Both Superbond C﹠B and PanaviaTM F have reliable shear bond strength with oxide ceramics,while RelyXTM Unicem is not so perfect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the shear bond strength between oxide ceramics and three resin cements.Methods:Blocks of zirconium dioxide and aluminium sesquioxide ceramics were treated with sandblasting and bonded with three luting cements respectively.After preserved in 37 ℃ water for 24 h,the shear bond strengths of these specimens were tested and the data were analyzed by SAS9.12 software package.Results:There were significant differences among alumina ceramics which manifested that shear bond strength of Superbond C﹠B was the highest(37.60±2.06)MPa.However,in zirconium dioxide groups,RelyXTM Unicem showed the lowest bond strength(13.29±3.05)MPa,but there was no difference between Superbond C﹠B and PanaviaTM F.Conclusion:Both Superbond C﹠B and PanaviaTM F have reliable shear bond strength with oxide ceramics,while RelyXTM Unicem is not so perfect.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the shear bond strength between oxide ceramics and three resin cements.Methods:Blocks of zirconium dioxide and aluminium sesquioxide ceramics were treated with sandblasting and bonded with three luting cements respectively.After preserved in 37 ℃ water for 24 h,the shear bond strengths of these specimens were tested and the data were analyzed by SAS9.12 software package.Results:There were significant differences among alumina ceramics which manifested that shear bond strength of Superbond C﹠B was the highest(37.60±2.06)MPa.However,in zirconium dioxide groups,RelyXTM Unicem showed the lowest bond strength(13.29±3.05)MPa,but there was no difference between Superbond C﹠B and PanaviaTM F.Conclusion:Both Superbond C﹠B and PanaviaTM F have reliable shear bond strength with oxide ceramics,while RelyXTM Unicem is not so perfect.

Key concepts: Materials science, Bond strength, Ceramic, Composite material, Zirconium dioxide, Sesquioxide, Zirconium, Aluminum oxide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of preliminary bond strength between oxide ceramics and three resin luting cements — Research Paper | ScholarLens